A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Call of Duty: Black Ops III

Channel:
Subscribers:
1,480
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfsVCfXMb7g



Duration: 2:59
3,022 views
29


How well can the mainstream integrated solutions from AMD and Intel handle the latest Call of Duty game? The engine under Black Ops III is still based on id Tech 3, albeit it is constantly fine tuned and features host of improvements with every CoD release. Native 1080p gaming is beyond the reach of integrated graphics, but lowering the Render Resolution leads to massive gains.

Intel slim-SFF build:
CASE + PSU: InWin BQ660 + 150W Internal PSU
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-WIFI Mini ITX LGA1151
CPU: Intel Core i3-6100 3.7GHz
GPU: integrated - Intel HD Graphics 530
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 3000MHz
STORAGE: Samsung m.2 SATA 500GB SSD 850 EVO
COOLER: SCYTHE Kozuti

AMD slim-SFF build:
CASE + PSU: InWin BQ660 + 150W Internal PSU
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI Mini ITX FM2+
CPU: AMD A10-7860K 3.6 Ghz/4.0 GHz
GPU: integrated - AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
RAM: G.SKILL Ares 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 2400MHz
STORAGE: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 2.5" SATA III 500GB
COOLER: Noctua NH-L9a AMD CPU Cooler

A dedicated recording PC with a capture card was used to save the game footages and consequently no performance penalty was incurred on the reviewed systems. For convenience, games are installed on an external SSD and connected to the reviewed PC via USB3.0 interface.

Don't forget to like and subscribe, visit http://boostclock.com for more information!




Other Videos By BoostClock


2016-12-15A10-7860K Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 1 DX11 vs DX12
2016-12-13A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - DiRT Rally
2016-12-04HP Pavilion A12-9800 OEM Bristol Ridge benchmark results
2016-11-30i3-6100 HD Graphics 530 Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 1 DX11 vs DX12
2016-11-19A10-7860K Frame Time Analysis - Rise of the Tomb Raider DX11 vs DX12
2016-11-12A10-7860K Frame Time Analysis - HITMAN (2016) DX11 vs DX12
2016-11-08A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield Hardline
2016-11-01A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 4
2016-10-27A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 3
2016-10-20A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Star Wars Battlefront
2016-10-14A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Call of Duty: Black Ops III
2016-10-09A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - F1 2016
2016-10-03Codemasters F1 2015 vs F1 2016 Graphics Comparison @ Suzuka
2016-09-27A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Grand Theft Auto V
2016-09-23A10-7860K Frame Time Analysis - DOOM OpenGL vs Vulkan
2016-09-18A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Minecraft
2016-09-13Codemasters F1 2015 vs F1 2016 Graphics Comparison @ Marina Bay Street Circuit
2016-09-10A10-7860K Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 1 Beta DX11 vs DX12
2016-09-03A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Hitman: Absolution & Sniper Elite III
2016-08-30Codemasters F1 2015 vs F1 2016 Graphics Comparison @ Monza
2016-08-25Codemasters F1 2015 vs F1 2016 Graphics Comparison @ Silverstone Rain



Tags:
amd apu
intel igp
benchmark
frame time analysis
Call of Duty
CoD
BlackOps3
A10-7860K
i3-6100
amd radeon r7
intel hd graphics 530



Other Statistics

Call of Duty: Black Ops III Statistics For BoostClock

At present, BoostClock has 3,022 views spread across 1 video for Call of Duty: Black Ops III, and less than an hour worth of Call of Duty: Black Ops III videos were uploaded to his channel. This is less than 0.33% of the total video content that BoostClock has uploaded to YouTube.