Another rule to ignore in your Pathfinder games (The Rules Lawyer)

Subscribers:
47,300
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK7S1cdQFLk



Duration: 10:04
13,004 views
1,141


CORRECTION: Some commenters are correct that a 'thin' line CAN cover all 3 orcs (if it's 2 squares per vertical line). So I'm incorrect there. A "thick line" could, however, cross 2 orcs who were adjacent to each other east-west, whereas a "thin line" could not. Since the grid is an abstraction, the caster would have a fair argument to say they could target both. My mistake also illustrates that the RAW way isn't immune to confusion. It's finicky, requires thinking "in the grid," referring to a diagram in the CRB and/or counting out squares! It seems to slow things down vs. just imagining a line... which is the opposite of what defenders of the rule said it would accomplish. My proposal is the caster can choose whether to use the "thin" or "thick" line, and to have a bit of flexibility with where they start their line.

ADDITION: If a caster casts Wall of Stone and it is placed on a diagonal, should a foe be able to "squeeze" through the diagonal? Most GMs would (rightly) say no. But that means thinking outside the grid and in the fiction, and is inconsistent with the "thin line." So sticking to the "thin line" for lightning bolt does pose a problem of inconsistency with how most GMs would adjudicate effects that are meant to act as barriers.

Hi all, I saw a couple comments and I wanted to let you know I'm doing fine lol! It's just cathartic, plus I thought it necessary to respond to personalistic attacks and make clear it's alright to criticize rules in PF2E.

I know full well the nature of Reddit is that it's those who disagree with an OP who are more likely to speak up in the post's thread. And that thread to be honest is actually much more favorable than the old hammer-flail one. But yeah there is a certain segment there that is just "anti-YouTuber" (it's a thing I've seen on Facebook groups, too), or don't like me for whatever reason, which is the reality of putting oneself out there on the internet. Whatever. In the end, it means that a public person must put himself or herself to a higher standard on thought and conduct, and in reality the appropriate response is to take such a person's opinion more seriously instead of the snide dismissive attitude that was on display. I will continue to speak my mind when I think I'm right, even if some disagree!

============================
This video drops on the day the PF2E subreddit is closed by the mods to protest Reddit's new policies, a cause I support. After today, you can view these threads:

The thread in question: https://www.reddit.com/r/Pathfinder2e/comments/158e1w5/orthogonallyadjacent_squares_in_a_line_area/

My 2021 post saying that flails and hammers needed a nerf:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Pathfinder2e/comments/qhtwja/does_the_critical_specialization_effect_for/

=============================

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE! I'm a lawyer who teaches and runs tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder, D&D, Starfinder) for kids, teens, and adults, and making videos related to TTRPGs and board games.

JOIN MY DISCORD to chat with our community and/or try the Pathfinder Beginner Box or our drop-in PF2e play system! https://discord.gg/ruleslawyer

SUPPORT MY PATREON for early access to many of my videos and access to exclusive content, and to support me! I do unpaid public-interest legal work and rely on the Patreon and private GMing.
https://www.patreon.com/theruleslawyer

For PF2E actual plays, SUBSCRIBE to my other channel, "RULES LAWYER DISCORD COMMUNITY CHANNEL":
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc1K95QD8Mv2Tr6Wne6KS9g

Follow me on TWITTER at: https://twitter.com/theruleslawyer1

Pick up your Pathfinder 2e book on Amazon using my affiliate links below. As an Amazon Affiliate, I earn from qualifying purchases which helps me continue doing what I love!
Pathfinder 2e Core Rulebook: https://amzn.to/3BiFCSj
Pathfinder 2e Beginner Box: https://amzn.to/3eVsUBB




Other Videos By The Rules Lawyer


2023-08-10Why Pathfinder 2e removing the 8 schools of magic is a good thing (Rules Lawyer)
2023-08-09Baldur's Gate 3's Tutorial SUCKS! I go over UI, Quality of Life tricks + NEW actions not in D&D 5e
2023-08-07The new WITCH, more surprises, + a couple things I'd fix in the Pathfinder REMASTER!
2023-08-04The Rules Lawyer and SwingRipper geek out and analyze the STARFINDER 2ND EDITION FIELD TEST!
2023-08-03Starfinder 2nd Edition announced, and it'll be FULLY COMPATIBLE with Pathfinder! (Rules Lawyer)
2023-08-03Join me as I play Quest for the Golden Candelabra, the free Pathfinder 2e Steam game! (Rules Lawyer)
2023-08-02DEEP DIVE into Pathfinder 2e's NEW Kineticist class! (Part 3 of Kineticist series from Rules Lawyer)
2023-07-28IS Pathfinder 2e nerfing casters? An analysis (The Rules Lawyer)
2023-07-275 KINETICISTS FIGHT in Pathfinder 2e! (Part 2 of Kineticist series)
2023-07-25I analyze the Pathfinder Core Preview PDF! (Rules Lawyer)
2023-07-25Another rule to ignore in your Pathfinder games (The Rules Lawyer)
2023-07-24Pathfinder players talk about D&D 4th Edition after playing 6 sessions (The Rules Lawyer)
2023-07-20D&D MONKS, BUT GOOD, Part 3: WHY is the Pathfinder 2e monk more fun?
2023-07-19Pathfinder 2e monks are NOT weak! See 5 monks in action! (D&D MONKS, BUT GOOD, Part 2: Combat)
2023-07-18D&D MONKS, BUT GOOD, Part 1: Overview, In-Depth Guide to Monks in Pathfinder 2e (Rules Lawyer)
2023-07-17Pathfinder 2e finally found its blaster caster? The new KINETICIST class! (Part 1: Overview)
2023-07-11Rules Lawyer Build #1: The Tank (Pathfinder 2e)
2023-07-05D&D's lack of direction, and the TRUTH behind the next edition of D&D (The Rules Lawyer)
2023-07-03Does Pathfinder combat BREAK IMMERSION? D&D YouTubers reflect on struggles and learning PF2 tactics
2023-06-28AGENTS OF EDGEWATCH in Pathfinder 2e! SESSION 1 (The Rules Lawyer)
2023-06-23Let's make BETTER versions of the official D&D movie statblocks, using Pathfinder 2e! (Rules Lawyer)



Tags:
rules lawyer
rpg
dnd
d&d



Other Statistics

Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous Statistics For The Rules Lawyer

At this time, The Rules Lawyer has 163,445 views for Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous spread across 11 videos. About 2 hours worth of Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous videos were uploaded to his channel, roughly 1.22% of the content that The Rules Lawyer has uploaded to YouTube.