Game:

KovaaK's (2018)

Duration: 9:02

5,707 views

542

This video is not criticizing a specific person or the opinions of a specific group. In this video, I'm tackling the concerns of members of the aim community as a whole who are genuinely concerned about how scores in the trainer translate into in-game improvement or aim improvement in general. The truth is that there is no need to be afraid of experimentation or change. Change that helps us to perform better is good, and we should look for opportunities to change, or rather, evolve like that in this space as often as possible.

Some scenarios are exceptions to what I go over in this video. I admit that running a very low sensitivity on scenarios like cloverrawcontrol will actually yield little improvement because you are specifically not getting the value that scenario is meant to provide- wrist and fingertip control. At the same time, some scenarios are very diverse, like Smoothbot Voltaic, where the same change of low sens will actually hurt you, and the benefit of better control is outweighed by the lack of mobility.

Lastly, a score is a score. If you just got a benchmark rank up from playing a static scenario at 90cm, the fact that you ran 90cm does NOT take away from the skill and knowledge that it took you to get that score. https://twitter.com/dr7coo/status/1769394237999595569
You should feel free to run whatever sensitivity you like. If anything, it shows adaptability and is an example of the versatility of us aimers when working with different settings. Please be proud of your scores. It takes hard work to achieve these things, and no one should be allowed to tell you that your scores mean nothing just because of your setup or approach.

Follow my Twitch:
twitch.tv/matty_ow
Discord: https://discord.gg/GZY643sPna
Voltaic: https://www.youtube.com/c/VoltaicHQ

Other Statistics