Remember AMD HBCC? Radeon Vega 64 High-Bandwidth Cache Test (Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020)

Remember AMD HBCC? Radeon Vega 64 High-Bandwidth Cache Test (Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020)

Channel:
Subscribers:
41,500
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_iU9Dq8O-M



Duration: 2:51
6,408 views
122


FS 2020 - Radeon Vega 64 HBCC Test
1440p ultra (low vol lightning & AO)
Ryzen 9 3900X
16GB DDR4-3200

HBCC is the controller for AMD’s high-bandwidth cache, what the company has functionally renamed from VRAM. There is no hard threshold as to what governs the naming designation of “high-bandwidth cache,” and should AMD produce a hypothetic GDDR5 Vega GPU, its framebuffer would also be named “high-bandwidth cache.” The card does not need HBM to have its framebuffer designated as HBC, in other words.

AMD’s High-Bandwidth Cache Controller is disabled by default. When enabled, the controller effectively converts VRAM into a last-level cache equivalent, then reserves a user-designated amount of system memory for allocation to the GPU. If the applications page-out of the on-card 8GB of HBM2, a trade-off between latency and capacity occurs and the GPU taps-in to system memory to grab its needed pages. If you’re storing 4K textures in HBM2 and exceed that 8GB capacity, and maybe need another 1GB for other assets, those items can be pushed to system memory and pulled via the PCIe bus. This is less effective than increasing on-card memory, but is significantly cheaper than doing so – even in spite of DDR pricing. Latency is introduced by means of traveling across the PCIe interface, through the CPU, and down the memory bus, then back, but it’s still faster than having to dump memory and swap data locally.

Hypothetically, this technology would permit large, working datasets to exist on system memory and give the GPU’s memory controller somewhat direct access to that dataset. Although it’s worse for latency, technically speaking, the additional capacity should outweigh that latency deficit in certain scenarios. It’s just going to take proper implementation to ever realize the gains, and that implementation must happen at both the software developers and AMD.

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

#AMD




Other Videos By TechEpiphany


2020-10-01ASUS Mini PC PN50 (Ryzen 7 4800U) Review - Part 1: Unboxing
2020-09-27Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G APU Review - Metro Exodus
2020-09-27AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G APU Test - Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
2020-09-18CS:GO on AMD Ryzen 3 4300G / Pro 4350G Vega 6 - Gameplay Benchmark Test
2020-09-18Call of Duty: Black Ops III on AMD Ryzen 3 4300G / Pro 4350G Vega 6 - Gameplay Benchmark Test
2020-09-16AMD Ryzen 3 4300G / Pro 4350G Vega 6 Test - Battlefield V in DirectX 11 & DirectX 12
2020-09-15Forrest Norrod (AMD, SVP & GM) talks Zen - Zen 3, Semi-Custom, Supply, China, 7nm Ramp & much more
2020-09-01Intel Core i7-1185G7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800U - Xe vs Vega iGPU Comparison Test (by intel)
2020-08-26Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on Radeon RX 5700XT 4K-1080p, ultra-low
2020-08-26Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on Radeon RX Vega 64 4K-1080p, ultra-low
2020-08-25Remember AMD HBCC? Radeon Vega 64 High-Bandwidth Cache Test (Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020)
2020-08-25Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on Radeon RX 560 2GB (16CU) 1080p
2020-08-21Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on Radeon RX 550 2GB
2020-08-214K Ultra Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on Ryzen 9 3900X and Radeon VII (NYC)
2020-08-20Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (1080p)
2020-08-19Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
2020-08-19Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 - AMD vs Nvidia - Quick Test
2020-08-19Flight Simulator 2020 on an AMD APU! (Ryzen 7 4700G Pro 4750G Vega 8)
2020-08-19Flight Simulator 2020 On Low Spec Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 GDDR5
2020-08-19Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, First Look On A GeForce GTX 1050
2020-08-17AMD Ryzen 3 4300G vs Ryzen 5 4600G vs Ryzen 7 4700G in 5 Games APU Comparison



Tags:
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Radeon RX Vega 64
HBCC
Test



Other Statistics

Microsoft Flight Simulator Statistics For TechEpiphany

TechEpiphany currently has 173,645 views spread across 15 videos for Microsoft Flight Simulator. There's close to 2 hours worth of content for Microsoft Flight Simulator published on his channel, making up less than 0.54% of the total overall content on TechEpiphany's YouTube channel.