Rosenberger v. University of Virginia
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 (1995), was an opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether a state university might, consistent with the First Amendment, withhold from student religious publications funding provided to similar secular student publications. The University of Virginia provided funding to every student organization that met funding-eligibility criteria, which Wide Awake, the student religious publication, fulfilled. The university's defense claimed that denying student activity funding of the religious magazine was necessary to avoid the University's violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court disagreed with the University; constitutional law scholar Michael W. McConnell argued on behalf of the student religious publication, and John Calvin Jeffries argued on behalf of the University of Virginia. The decision centered upon Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, a document on religious freedom by James Madison.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosenberger_v._University_of_Virginia
Created with WikipediaReaderReborn (c) WikipediaReader
Other Videos By WikiReader
2021-08-10 | Terminator (terminal emulator) |
2021-08-10 | Left Behind |
2021-08-10 | Patelloida conulus |
2021-08-10 | Piri Reis |
2021-08-10 | Aviation in Maryland |
2021-08-10 | Guldstaden IB |
2021-08-09 | I Build This Garden for Us |
2021-08-09 | Pleocarphus |
2021-08-09 | Marginella croukampi |
2021-08-09 | Harish Chaudhary |
2021-08-09 | Rosenberger v. University of Virginia |
2021-08-09 | Cristina Alberdi |
2021-08-09 | Vincent Wan |
2021-08-09 | Jacques Perrin |
2021-08-09 | Kansas's 8th congressional district |
2021-08-09 | Ya ba |
2021-08-09 | CNL Financial Group |
2021-08-09 | Wood Pit disaster |
2021-08-09 | Caterham Cricket Club |
2021-08-09 | Rash, Alabama |
2021-08-09 | List of leaders of dependent territories in 2021 |