Teaching 3D archaeological documentation in the field and classroom

Subscribers:
9,540
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVsGR6bKYKk



Duration: 0:00
48 views
0


Jari Pakkanen, Ann Brysbaert

The 3D field-documentation courses of the Finnish Institute at Athens were started in 2014 and they have been run at the Bronze Age site of Tiryns in the Argolid and at the Archaic to Hellenistic town at Ambelakia on Salamis. Their aim has been to train students without previous experience in archaeological documentation to work with reflectorless total stations and photogrammetry. In 2014–2016 and 2018 these courses and fieldwork were run in collaboration with Leiden University. In these field-courses students were introduced to both equipment and software used in intensive 3D feature-by-feature documentation. They learn to use reflectorless total stations as a drawing tool and the advantages the method has over traditional static total station work with prism. The second technique taught was photogrammetry, including how to combine the produced line-documentation with photogrammetry models. Students quickly learned the principles of 3D work and how to use the hardware and post-processing software. Behind the fast learning process lies in the one-to-one teaching and the hands-on work with in-situ archaeological remains. The time in the field and number of repetitions need to be intense enough so that the procedures become automatic. This paper aims to illustrate the field-course processes and how used methods have developed over the years. It discusses how the obtained skills have fed into the subsequent studies and research of the students and colleagues who have participated. Teaching on the field courses is compared with running classroom-based 3D documentation teaching at Royal Holloway, University of London.




Other Videos By TALE: The Archaeology Lecture E-library


2025-07-10Geophysical survey in tropical forest: Results of research carried out at the pre-Columbian centre
2025-07-09Between traditional and innovative. Case study of deserted forest village Neuhaus
2025-07-08Mapping legacies of historic charcoal production on the landscape scale
2025-07-07Airborne laser scanning in Białowieża Primeval Forest
2025-07-04Discussant
2025-07-032 Welcome to the
2025-07-02The European Research Council (ERC) and its funding schemes
2025-07-01Ecological Marginality and Internal Migration on the Mesa Verde North Escarpment
2025-06-30Is Now a Good Time? Bridging Past and Present with Models and Modeling
2025-06-27Archeoinformatics and the Archaeological Digital Initiative: Successes and Challenges Teaching
2025-06-26Teaching 3D archaeological documentation in the field and classroom
2025-06-25Problem- and Project-based Learning in Digital Archaeology: Potential and Challenges
2025-06-24Learning to See vs Learning to Understand. Why is Teaching Digital Archaeology so Difficult?
2025-06-23Sophy & White: The Dunollie Collections Unboxed
2025-06-22Challenging students by integrating digital archaeology
2025-06-20Teaching Archeomatics at the University of Tours
2025-06-19Teaching Digital Archaeology at European Universities
2025-06-18Education of Digital Archaeology at Polish universities, different approaches
2025-06-18From Point to Pattern. Integration of Spatial Data Analysis Methods for Settlement Pattern
2025-06-17Modeling the Ptolemaic Cultural Export: A Quantitative Evaluation of the Spread of the Isiac Cults
2025-06-17Teaching Digital Archaeology at Leiden University