Thomas Vidick: A Multiprover Interactive Proof System for the Local Hamiltonian Problem

Channel:
Subscribers:
2,450
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1m7bcyEbhE



Duration: 48:51
402 views
1


Thomas Vidick (Caltech)
A Multiprover Interactive Proof System for the Local Hamiltonian Problem
QuICS Workshop on the Frontiers of Quantum Information and Computer Science (October 1, 2015)

In this talk I will introduce a variant of the “quantum PCP conjecture” formulated in terms of multiplayer games, and provide a first step toward the proof of the new conjecture.

For this, I will describe a quantum interactive proof system for the local Hamiltonian problem on n qubits in which the verifier has a single round of interaction with three entangled provers, receiving only a constant number of qubits from each prover. Completeness and soundness of this protocol are separated by an inverse polynomial in n, and the conjecture is that this can be improved to a constant.

This result provides the first indication that quantum multiprover interactive proof systems with entangled provers may be strictly more powerful than unentangled-prover interactive proof systems. A distinguishing feature of our protocol is that the completeness property requires honest provers to share a large entangled state, obtained as the encoding of the ground state of the local Hamiltonian via a simple error-correcting code.

Based on joint work with Joseph Fitzsimons of the Centre for Quantum Technologies.




Other Videos By QuICS


2016-10-20Akihiro Mizutani: Towards Secure QKD with Testable Assumptions on Modulation Devices
2016-10-20Thomas Jennewein: Implementing Free-Space QKD Systems Between Moving Platforms
2015-10-06Daniel Nagaj: Very Entangled Spin Chains
2015-10-06Martin Roetteler: Reversible Circuit Compilation with Space Constraints
2015-10-06Daniel Gottesman: Stabilizer Codes for Prime Power Qudits
2015-10-06Norbert Schuch: Topological Phase Transitions in Tensor Networks: A Holographic Perspective
2015-10-06Debbie Leung: On the Power of PPT-preserving and Non-signalling Codes
2015-10-06Aram Harrow: Quantum Adiabatic Optimization Versus Quantum Monte Carlo
2015-10-06Michael Bremner: Average-case Complexity Vs. Approx. Simulation of Commuting Quantum Computations
2015-10-06Chris Monroe: Time to Build a Real Quantum Computer
2015-10-06Thomas Vidick: A Multiprover Interactive Proof System for the Local Hamiltonian Problem
2015-10-06Robin Kothari: Quantum Linear Systems Algorithms with Exponentially Improved Dependence on Precision
2015-10-06Eddie Farhi: A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
2015-10-06Seth Lloyd: Universal Deep Quantum Learning
2015-10-06Mark Zhandry: Quantum Query Solvability: A Refinement of Quantum Query Complexity and Applications
2015-10-06Jeongwan Haah: Optimal Tomography of Quantum States
2015-10-06David Gosset: Gapped and Gapless Phases of Frustration-free Spin-1/2 chains
2015-10-06Beni Yoshida: Classifying Fault-tolerant Logical Gates by Group Cohomology (or SPT Phases)
2015-10-06Mark Zhandry: Quantum Query Solvability: A Refinement of Quantum Query Complexity and Applications
2015-10-06Mario Szegedy: Issues Concerning the Area Law in Quantum Physics
2015-10-06Lorenza Viola: Fixed-point Engineering in Quasi-local Open-system Dynamics