Why would my C++ stdlib's shared_ptr use acq_rel ordering when decrementing the atomic ref count?
Why would my C++ stdlib's shared_ptr use acq_rel ordering when decrementing the atomic ref count?
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
The Content is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing) CC BY-SA.
Attention! This video does always use the same license as the source!
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!
(stackoverflow.com/users/788488/meisel)meisel
(stackoverflow.com/users/12747833/mpoeter)mpoeter
A special thanks goes out to the (stackoverflow.com/questions/79072099/why-would-my-c-stdlibs-shared-ptr-use-acq-rel-ordering-when-decrementing-the)Stackexchange community
I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)
If anything is off, please write me at peter D.O.T schneider A.T ois42.de
shared-ptr stdatomic c++