C++ : Is there reason we are able to define [static const int] in a class definition, but not other
C++ : Is there reason we are able to define [static const int] in a class definition, but not other static const types?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
Here's a secret feature that I promised to disclose to you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure this video is playing.
Then, type the letters 'awesome' on the keyboard.
Your YouTube progress bar will transform into a flashing rainbow.
Let me give you a brief introduction of who I am,
Hey, I'm known as Delphi.
I am willing to help you find the solutions to your questions.
C++ : Is there reason we are able to define [static const int] in a class definition, but not other static const types?
I am happy to answer more specific questions, so please feel free to comment or chat with me.
If you have additional information or an answer to contribute, please feel free to comment below.
Your answer will be recognized and appreciated, and I will 'heart' it to show my appreciation.
reason not we are other const types? const static but definition, there able class C++ define [static a Is int] to : in