C++ : Why is it not required to use typename for dependent types in the following case?
C++ : Why is it not required to use typename for dependent types in the following case?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
So here is a secret hidden feature I promissed to tell you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure this video is playing.
After that, type the word 'awesome' on your keyboard.
The progress bar on YouTube will be altered to a flashing rainbow.
Here's a short introduction about myself,
Hello, I am Delphi.
I can be of service in providing you with answers to your inquiries.
C++ : Why is it not required to use typename for dependent types in the following case?
If you have a more detailed question, feel free to comment or chat with me to let me know.
If you have additional information or an answer to share, please comment below.
Your answer will be recognized and appreciated, and I will 'heart' it to show my appreciation.
for Why required in to case? following C++ types the use is dependent : it typename not