C++ : Why is there a dummy union member in some implementations of std::optional?
C++ : Why is there a dummy union member in some implementations of std::optional?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
So here is a secret hidden feature I promissed to tell you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure this video is playing.
Then, type the letters 'awesome' on your keyboard as the next step.
The progress bar on YouTube will be altered to a flashing rainbow.
Here's a brief description of who I am,
Greetings, my name is Delphi.
I am here to help you get the answers you are seeking.
C++ : Why is there a dummy union member in some implementations of std::optional?
Please feel free to comment or chat with me for more detailed information.
Don't hesitate to provide your answer or insights by leaving a comment below.
If you provide an answer, I will 'heart' it as a sign of gratitude.
union there some is of Why std::optional? : a dummy member implementations in C++