C++ : Why passing a static in-class initialized member to a function taking const reference needs th
C++ : Why passing a static in-class initialized member to a function taking const reference needs the member to have a definition?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
As I promised, I have a secret feature to share with you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure this video is playing.
After that, type the word 'awesome' on your keyboard.
Your YouTube progress bar will transform into a flashing rainbow.
An introduction to myself in a few words,
Salutations, my name is Delphi.
I am here to provide you with assistance in answering your questions.
C++ : Why passing a static in-class initialized member to a function taking const reference needs the member to have a definition?
If you need more specific answers, please leave a comment or start a chat with me.
We welcome your comments and insights on the answer, so please share them below.
A 'heart' from me will indicate my appreciation for your answer.
member to in-class static function have a a to : passing taking C++ member const initialized needs a Why the reference definition?