Create a computer/phone wallpaper using AI
Here's how to Create a computer/phone wallpaper using AI.
i. AI wallpaper generator vs. copyright law is a complex and controversial topic that has not been settled by the courts yet. However, below are some general information and sources that may help you understand the issue better.
AI wallpaper generators are tools that use artificial intelligence to create images based on text prompts or other inputs. They often use pre-existing images from the internet as sources of inspiration or training data. Some examples of AI wallpaper generators are [Media.io], [Hotpot.ai], [VEED.IO], and [Appy Pie].
The main legal question is whether AI-generated images are original and creative enough to be protected by copyright law, and whether they infringe on the rights of the human authors of the images that they use. There are different arguments and perspectives on this issue:
- Some argue that AI-generated images are not original or creative, because they are merely the result of algorithms and data, and do not reflect any human intention or expression. Therefore, they are not eligible for copyright protection, and may also violate the rights of the human authors of the images that they use.
- Others argue that AI-generated images are original and creative, because they are the product of human design and input, and reflect some degree of human skill and judgment. Therefore, they are eligible for copyright protection, and may also respect the rights of the human authors of the images that they use, as long as they are sufficiently transformative or fair use.
- Still others argue that AI-generated images are a new form of art that challenges the traditional notions of originality and creativity, and that they require a new legal framework that recognizes the role and rights of both humans and AI in the creative process.
There are currently no clear or consistent rules or precedents on how to deal with AI-generated images in different jurisdictions. However, there have been some lawsuits and disputes involving AI-generated images and their creators, users, and sources. For example:
- In 2023, Getty Images sued Stability AI, the maker of Stable Diffusion, an AI image generator, for copying millions of its images and using them to train its AI without permission or payment.
- In 2023, three visual artists filed a class action lawsuit against Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt, three AI image generator providers, for violating the rights of millions of artists by using their images to create and sell AI-generated works.
- In 2023, a US district judge dismissed the artists' lawsuit, ruling that it was not plausible to determine whether AI-generated images infringed on the rights of human authors at this stage.
- In
Learn more:
(1) Artists lose first copyright battle in the fight against AI-generated .... https://www.computerworld.com/article/3709691/artists-lose-first-copyright-battle-in-the-fight-against-ai-generated-images.html.
(2) AI image generator copyright infringement | Gowling WLG. https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-resources/articles/2023/ai-image-generator-copyright-infringement/.
(3) Are A.I. Image Generators Violating Copyright Laws?. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/are-ai-image-generators-stealing-from-artists-180981488/.
(4) Works created by AI image generators pose copyright risks. https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/works-created-ai-image-generators-pose-copyright-risks.
Learn more@ https://www.youtube.com/c/ITGuides/search?query=wallpaper.