How can I manage perform n + m checks instead of n * m for constexpr values?
0How can I manage perform n + m checks instead of n * m for constexpr values?
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
The Content is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing) CC BY-SA.
Attention! This video does always use the same license as the source!
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!
(stackoverflow.com/users/9140652/osama-ahmad)Osama Ahmad
(stackoverflow.com/users/9140652/osama-ahmad)Osama Ahmad
(stackoverflow.com/users/2684539/jarod42)Jarod42
(stackoverflow.com/users/2229039/abcdefg)abcdefg
(stackoverflow.com/users/2610810/caleth)Caleth
A special thanks goes out to the (stackoverflow.com/questions/79640301/how-can-i-manage-perform-n-m-checks-instead-of-n-m-for-constexpr-values)Stackexchange community
I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)
If anything is off, please write me at peter D.O.T schneider A.T ois42.de
c++ lambda constexpr templates