Is there a faster way to find the first value that is not NA in a large vector using base R?
0Is there a faster way to find the first value that is not NA in a large vector using base R?
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
The Content is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing) CC BY-SA.
Attention! This video does always use the same license as the source!
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!
(stackoverflow.com/users/17483781/nonameted)noNameTed
(stackoverflow.com/users/12545041/samr)SamR
(stackoverflow.com/users/12158757/thomasiscoding)ThomasIsCoding
(stackoverflow.com/users/4552295/s-baldur)s_baldur
(stackoverflow.com/users/9462095/andre-wildberg)Andre Wildberg
(stackoverflow.com/users/884372/carl-witthoft)Carl Witthoft
A special thanks goes out to the (stackoverflow.com/questions/79125870/is-there-a-faster-way-to-find-the-first-value-that-is-not-na-in-a-large-vector-u)Stackexchange community
I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)
If anything is off, please write me at peter D.O.T schneider A.T ois42.de
na performance bigdata r