The Confusion of Atheists - What is Atheism?
9PS: I forgot to mention that atheists seem to have a double standard where it comes to "evidence": they find "not convincing" the evidence presented by theists in arguments such as trascendental, moral, or fine-tuning; but they find "convincing" the evidence for unproven or uncertain facts such as macroevolution, abiogenesis, quantum fluctuations.
Ironic isn't it?
2 PS: Just remember than theism arguments do not prove which God (or gods) are true.
That's why there is monotheism, politheism, pantheism etc.
So then, to determine which God (or gods) and religion is true, you have to make a case by analyzing the evidence, the history and the corroboration of each religion.
The purpose of the video is not which view of theism or religion is correct and true, so don't bring it up :)
Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/#DefiAthe
Articles or sites showed:
https://www.equip.org/articles/atheism-and-the-burden-of-proof/
https://www.answers-in-reason.com/religion/atheism/do-we-atheists-have-a-burden-of-proof-conflated-and-misunderstood-terms-vol-7/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/104803/do-atheists-bear-the-burden-of-proof-in-showing-why-how-the-reasons-presented-by
*If you are caught excessively commenting, being disrespectful, insulting or derailing, then your comments will be removed.