The fatal flaw in our political assumptions | Rutger Bregman

Subscribers:
526,000
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JaF1ABB5v4



Duration: 0:00
2,770 views
143


Rutger Bregman speaks to Grace Blakeley about why he turned his focus from politics to social psychology.

What assumptions about human nature underpin the way we assess the viability of political systems?

With a free trial, you can watch the full conversation NOW at https://iai.tv/video/in-conversation-rutger-bregman-and-grace-blakeley?utm_source=YouTube

Neo-marxist economist Grace Blakeley and anti-establishment historian Rutger Bregman discuss the future of the left, and whether humanity is inherently good after all…

#politics #socialpsychology #humannature #universalbasicincome

Rutger Bregman is a historian and author, known for his advocacy of universal basic income, a fifteen hour work week and open borders. His books Humankind (2020) and Utopia for Realists (2017) were both New York Times Bestsellers, and have been translated in more than 40 languages. Rutger made headlines when he appeared at the World Economic Forum in Davos, and use the opportunity to call out the super-rich audience for tax avoidance.

00:00 Introduction
00:19 UBI and human nature
04:01 Veneer theory and social psychology
05:52 Stanford prison experiment debunked
09:00 The dark side of our friendliness
13:06 Arnold Douwes

The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today! https://iai.tv/subscribe?utm_source=YouTube

For debates and talks: https://iai.tv/
For articles: https://iai.tv/articles
For courses: https://iai.tv/iai-academy/courses




Other Videos By The Institute of Art and Ideas


2025-05-14Roger Penrose doesn't understand what consciousness is | Joscha Bach
2025-05-13Do humans and animals have the same consciousness? | Noble, Hameroff, and Tramacere
2025-05-11Let's not "die on this rock" | Physicist Matt O'Dowd on space travel
2025-05-10Does quantum theory violate the speed of light? | Claudia de Rham, João Magueijo, and Tim Maudlin
2025-05-09We live in an elective aristocracy | Rutger Bregman
2025-05-08The price-value paradox | Daniel Susskind, Abby Innes, Richard Kibble, and Will Hutton
2025-05-07"It doesn't even have to have neurons." | Stuart Hameroff and Güneş Taylor
2025-05-06This is the dawn of machine consciousness | Joscha Bach FULL INTERVIEW
2025-05-03Are white holes a theoretical fantasy? | Roger Penrose and Carlo Rovelli go head-to-head
2025-05-02Why you shouldn't speak to a counsellor right after a traumatic event | Professor Simon Wessely
2025-05-01The fatal flaw in our political assumptions | Rutger Bregman
2025-04-30What can't you put on a computer? | Roger Penrose
2025-04-29What does China really want? | Steve Tsang on Xi Jinping
2025-04-28Whoever thought that Darwin and consciousness were incompatible? | Prof. Denis Noble
2025-04-27I have to disagree with a Nobel Prize winner | Sabine Hossenfelder on the conscious observer
2025-04-26Is consciousness older than evolution? | Denis Noble and Stuart Hameroff go head to head
2025-04-25What the stars tell us about truth | Hilary Lawson
2025-04-24What awaits us in deep space? | Sabine Hossenfelder, Matt O'Dowd, Anders Sandberg, and more
2025-04-23Why Einstein was a determinist | Sabine Hossenfelder
2025-04-22Is empire back? US, China, and beyond | Fukuyama, Rachman, Samuel, Kaplan
2025-04-21The Right's obsession with births | David Aaronovitch