17 April 2021. Talking on Tomsk, Guiding Principles, Part 1.
1517 April 2021. Our personal Guiding Principles, in reading Tomsk Reports; Talking on Tomsk
To give a bigger picture outsides the strictly technical explanation of how to decrypt the Schumann-series info.
(Content starts at 10 mins. )
***
In this post I'm including a recent "full report capture" from the website of Disclosure news.it; the Italian-based affiliate runs real-time data stream sourced from Tomsk State University's Radio Electronics school; which hosts their own website the livestream their sensor readings.
The "full report capture" is our working illustration.
Tomsk State University is a public University, as such is one of the oldest in Ukraine, Russia. Originally, it was a division of the older-still Polytechnical Institute, located down the street from TSU; having broken-off in 1950's.
Like the majority of universities around the world, it is staffed primarily with graduate students, who are simply looking to build their career in the sciences. They have done an excellent job to this point, providing valuable technical data, free to the world, as it has been a part of their public charter to do such.
It is only publically-funded institutions (usually educational ones) who are potentially going to post their data freely for the world to review and criticize.
Truly scientific ventures are often funded by a grant, and as such, should not be expected to be as freely-publishing results of their data, accessible for the "lay community", or the populations as a whole. Grant-funded research will be published in technical, and trade journals.
In previous posts, I've specifically addressed such articles, so that those who are not familiar with scientific "peer review" papers have a familiarity with the actual research.
More importantly, this addresses the issue of why isn't there more freely-available results from the wealth of detectors world-wide operating currently?
The short answer is that there are plenty of stations out there...
if you know where to look, and how to research; then the data is accessible to all. Given time and patience you can assemble a trove or research this topic; to become as knowledgeable as I am. I have an abundence of both for this subject matter. So, I've come across all sorts of great documentation; thusly presenting it freely to the public, as a public service.
What I am doing here is not to provide you with information that you can't get for yourself. What I'm doing here is to help you learn how to interperate this data, based on my 30+ years experience with radio, broadcast, and electronics.
As a Guiding Principle, we use Occum's Razor: that the simpler explanation is preferred. Extrodinary claims require extrodinary proof. Data tampering or manipulation is such a claim. Manipulated or tampered readings claims are extra-ordinary claims. As a technically-minded person, I'm hard-pressed to figure-out a way to get in there to tamper with the data, when it was designed to be run, fairly autonomously without human intervention ... do I dare to even say it? Yes, I have to say the obvious: This system is made autonomously, so as to avoid data tampering ...
There are indeed even articles by antenna operators who discuss an autonomously running system. One such example is found on schumann-resonances.com.
Data tampering @ TSU claims are an element of the Disney-side of the "Ascension" narrative. My reasonable reply to this is: The "powers-that-be" don't need to foil us, nor confound us... we do a fine-enough job for them in sabotaging our own mission. It's far easier to run a funky narrative to people that they can subjective feel, that takes the place of real facts, and substance.
The fact is, they can't really fuck with the actual data, so they simply need to whisper funky things into the mainstream, as a cover, or diversion...one of the any layers to this labyrinth "They" totally unwittingly merely need to have unexplained power drop-out from the mains, for the funky-side of the narrative to sprout, like a fungus...
It's very easy to use technical glitches not otherwise explainable, to explain the alleged phenomena--which would not otherwise be visible. Identifying a data void on the charts and graphs as a "timeline shift" is such an example of this type of misappropriation. This falls under the 'belief', not 'established fact', category.
-
_+_
Tomsk link: (https://tusur.ru/en/about-tusur/history)
Image Link: (https://www.disclosurenews.it/schumann-resonance-last-image/)
Schumann Resonances website blog: (https://www.schumann-resonances.com/post/17-april-2021-our-personal-guiding-principles-in-reading-tomsk-reports)
Wordpress link: (https://vertearbustosschumannresonanceharmonics.wordpress.com/2021/04/17/17-april-2021-our-personal-guiding-principles-in-reading-tomsk-reports/)
Patreon Link: (https://www.patreon.com/posts/50154140)