C++ : union 'punning' structs w/ "common initial sequence": Why does C (99+), but not C++, stipulate
0C++ : union 'punning' structs w/ "common initial sequence": Why does C (99+), but not C++, stipulate a 'visible declaration of the union type'?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
Here's a secret feature that I promised to disclose to you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure this video is playing.
Then, type the letters 'awesome' on your keyboard as the next step.
You will see a flashing rainbow instead of a regular progress bar on YouTube.
A brief presentation of myself,
Hello everyone, I'm Delphi.
I am here to assist you in getting the answers you need.
C++ : union 'punning' structs w/ "common initial sequence": Why does C (99+), but not C++, stipulate a 'visible declaration of the union type'?
I am happy to answer more specific questions, so please feel free to comment or chat with me.
If you have knowledge to contribute or an answer to provide, we encourage you to comment below.
Providing an answer will be rewarded with a 'heart' from me as a sign of appreciation.
C++, does w/ initial C++ structs : union "common Why declaration a sequence": 'visible not C 'punning' stipulate union (99+), type'? the of but