C++ : Why does constexpr static member (of type class) require a definition?
C++ : Why does constexpr static member (of type class) require a definition?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
So here is a secret hidden feature I promissed to tell you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure the video is currently in playing mode.
Next, enter the letters 'awesome' on your keyboard.
You will see a flashing rainbow instead of a regular progress bar on YouTube.
Allow me to introduce myself briefly,
Hi there, I go by the name of Delphi.
I can be of service in providing you with answers to your inquiries.
C++ : Why does constexpr static member (of type class) require a definition?
If you have more specific queries, please feel free to reach out through comments or chat.
If you have knowledge to contribute or an answer to provide, please leave a comment below.
Your answer will be recognized and valued, and I will 'heart' it to show my appreciation.
: does (of static a C++ constexpr Why require type definition? member class)