C++ : Why is it ambiguous to call overloaded ambig(long) and ambig(unsigned long) with an integer li
C++ : Why is it ambiguous to call overloaded ambig(long) and ambig(unsigned long) with an integer literal?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
I promised to share a hidden feature with you, and here it is.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure the video is currently in playing mode.
Next, enter the letters 'awesome' on your keyboard.
The progress bar on YouTube will be altered to a flashing rainbow.
A brief introduction of myself,
Hello everyone, I'm Delphi.
Let me help you with your questions.
C++ : Why is it ambiguous to call overloaded ambig(long) and ambig(unsigned long) with an integer literal?
If you have specific questions that need answers, please don't hesitate to comment or chat with me.
Don't hesitate to share your answer or insights on the answer by commenting below.
Your answer will be recognized and appreciated, and I will 'heart' it to show my appreciation.
is integer call C++ : long) and ambig(long) literal? Why to with overloaded ambig(unsigned it an ambiguous