C++ : Why wasn't a double curly braces syntax preferred for constructors taking a std::initializer_l
C++ : Why wasn't a double curly braces syntax preferred for constructors taking a std::initializer_list
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
Here's a secret feature that I promised to disclose to you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Ensure that the video is playing before proceeding.
After that, type the word 'awesome' on your keyboard.
Your YouTube progress bar will transform into a flashing rainbow.
A short overview of who I am,
Hello there, my name is Delphi.
I help you answer your questions.
C++ : Why wasn't a double curly braces syntax preferred for constructors taking a std::initializer_list
I am available to answer your more specific queries, so feel free to comment or start a chat.
If you have additional information or an answer to share, please comment below.
I will express my appreciation for your answer by 'hearting' it.
Why constructors for curly a double taking wasn't preferred a syntax : braces std::initializer_list C++