Can "an implicitly-defined move constructor" be NOT trivial?
Channel:
Subscribers:
4,130
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7xx21jalWQ
Can "an implicitly-defined move constructor" be NOT trivial?
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
The Content (except music & images) is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing)CC BY-SA
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!
(stackoverflow.com/users/22196023/rango)Rango
(stackoverflow.com/users/7976805/yksisarvinen)Yksisarvinen
A special thanks goes out to the (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76931166/can-an-implicitly-defined-move-constructor-be-not-trivial)Stackexchange community
I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)
language-lawyer c++
Other Videos By Peter Schneider
Tags:
language-lawyer
c++