Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? | Philip Tetlock | Talks at Google

Subscribers:
2,390,000
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f73A-HB-08M



Duration: 50:08
13,069 views
93


Philip Tetlock is the Mitchell Professor of Leadership at the University of California, Berkeley. His current research areas and interests include the following:

* Learning from experience: How do experts think about possible pasts (historical counterfactuals) and probable futures (conditional forecasts)? And how do experts respond to confirmation/disconfirmation of expectations?
* Designing accountability systems: How do people cope with various types of accountability pressures and demands in their social world? When does accountability promote mindless conformity? Defensive bolstering of prior positions? Thoughtful self-critical analysis? ...
* De-biasing judgment and choice. How can organization structure incentives and accountability procedures be used to check common cognitive biases such as belief perseverance and over-confidence? What adverse side effects can such de-biasing efforts have on quality of decision-making?


Professor Tetlock came to Google to talk about his book, "Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?"

This event took place on August 24, 2006, as a part of the Authors@Google series.







Tags:
talks at google
ted talks
inspirational talks
educational talks
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?
Philip Tetlock
politics
policy talks
government parties