ExplainingComputers talks nonsense (read desc)
0Just disagreeing is fine, but to incorrectly state nonsense which is obviously false, as heard in this very setence of the video which I clipped at the time which I timestamped in my comment, and then go for personal attacks about how I don't treat people poistively and how the lack of wide spread adoption of the Linux kernel is my fault, this is not acceptable behaviour.
A high subscriber count on a channel certainly does not mean they get to talk nonsense without accountability, That's why I called out this nonsense in this video of mine. If it were just a random user account I wouldn't bother with such, having a large audience means being held to a higher standard.
Me saying that people who say "linux distos" instead of "GNU/Linux distros" hold back the spread of software freedom is of course a direct response to his personal attack against me, which is why I feel comfortable using a similar personal attack against him while calling him out for his nonsense.
In any case I believe it is true what I said.
I don't hate the guy, I quite like his videos, but this sort of nonsense is not cool. Not bothering to check what he himself said in his own video before commenting nonsense and going for personal attacks is to be held accountable for.
If he didn't have the time or he has too many comments to respond to or whatever excuse someone might come up with, then perhaps he should not respond to the comments at all.
When it comes to copyright law, this is fair use under USA copyright law, as I am criticizing and making a quotation. So my use of this clip of his is legal.
here's the original video btw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h30HBYxtws