💻 "HyperOS V2 x64" by Masum A. / ⭐All Stars⭐ 🏁 Qualifying 🏁 Custom W 10 Builds
0💻 Kev's Reviews | Single Review: "HyperOS V2 x64" (Windows 10 Pro 1803 / 17134.1) by Masum A. / ⭐All Stars⭐ 🏁 Qualifying 🏁 Custom W 10 Builds / Low-End Laptop: January 2022 #2 / February 2022
https://www.youtube.com/KevsReviewsOnYT
Only @ #kevsreviews: #realmachinetesting / #novirtualmachine / #precision / #accuracy / #customiso / #customwindows / #windows10 / #windows10iso / #gaming / #power / #performance / #hyperos
OVERVIEW: The best Performing (custom) Windows 10 builds ...
... on my old mid 2015 non-gaming Lenovo Z50-70 laptop (Model: Lenovo 20354) - let's bring back life to it!
Specs:
► Intel Pentium 3558U / 2 Cores, 2 Threads @ 1,7 GHz (Stock) / TDP: 15W / "Haswell" Q4'13
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/78945/intel-pentium-processor-3558u-2m-cache-1-70-ghz.html
► Integrated Intel HD Graphics / Haswell GT1 @ 200 MHz Base Frequency & 1 GHz Max Dynamic Frequency
► Mainboard: Lenovo Lancer 5A5
► 4 GB DDR3 SDRAM Single-Channel, upgraded to 8 GB DDR3 SDRAM Dual-Channel (2 x 4 GB) @ 1.600 MHz in total
► 256 GB Samsung SSD MZYTE256HMHP-000L2 / Firmware Version: EXT06L0Q
► BIOS/UEFI Version: 9BCN26WW / Date: 07-31-2014 / Settings: largely default
My Aim:
... is just to give you an IMPRESSION about which Custom Windows OS might perform on the same and/or similar hardware (specs) in terms of Computing Performance ("Pure Performance Rev. I/II"), Graphics Power, CPU-Z Performance and input latency (/IO).
Please Mind: My benchmark tests focus solely on performance out-of-the-box and hence I am not paying attention to any (manual) "Post Install" procedures, so of course there will be ALWAYS a way to improve things on a certain build - it's just an IMPRESSION "at the end of the day". 😎
This being said: I am always open for constructive feedback/criticism! 😊
• 4.2: Performed Tests:
Geekbench 5.4.3: CPU Single-Core (default)
Geekbench 5.4.3: CPU Multi-Core (default)
Geekbench 5.4.3: GPU OpenCL (default)
PassMark 9.0: (default)
Cinebench vR23.2.0.0: CPU Multi-Core (default)
CPU-Z 1.98.0.x64: CPU Bench Single Thread (default)
CPU-Z 1.98.0.x64: CPU Bench Multi Thread (default)
FurMark 1.29.0.0: FullHD (no AA)
FurMark 1.29.0.0: HD (no AA)
FurMark 1.29.0.0: 1024 x 768 (no AA)
FurMark 1.29.0.0: 400 x 300 (no AA)
Unigine Heaven 4.0: 640 x 480; Low Quality, no AA, DX 11, no Tessellation
3DMark11 v1.0.132: GPU DX11 720p Performance Test