i7- 3537u vs i7-10700k in cinebench r20

Channel:

A_Chocolate_Cookie

Subscribers:

1,720

Published on April 14, 2023 12:10:41 AM ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwZh6WNbmS0

Duration: 8:36

72 views

4

the score was lower than usual for my 10700k, usually it gets around 5100 points
but I noticed that for some reason its priority was set to below normal in task manager on both systems!
after recording I set it to high and re did the tests,
10700k gets 5108 points on all core test and 523 single core, 9.77mp ratio.
3537u gets 566 points on all core test and 224 single core, 2.53mp ratio.

I find it interesting that the new cpu single core is almost equal to the 2c/4t of the older processor.

3537u has a tdp of about 17w
the 10700k can easily use significantly more! Unlocked I think the most I saw it use was about 180w in some stress test/benchmark in xtu while I was still figuring out my oc.

The most I witnessed my laptop use is 18w
18 x 9.77 (the mp ratio in the 10700k cinebench score) gives 175.86.
so the 10700k gets roughly 9.7x the performance of a 3537u and uses roughly 9.7x the power to do so.

is this impressive?
I mean, depending on how you look at it, the 10700k is a monster compared to the 3537u, but it doesnt seem to be any more efficient since its 9.7x faster and 9.7x more power hungry.....

but to be fair to the 10700k, during less demanding tasks, it doesn't use 100+w
in osu it is in the 20-30 range when 3537u is 15-18w depending if I use the integrated gpu or dedicated gpu (integrated results in more power draw)
and in beamng.drive, 3537u is again at the tdp limit of 17ish w and 10700k is in the 80-110w range.

so basically, 3537u cant go past 18w and 10700k with no power limit can use something like 180w under worst case scenario, but in normal scenarios, it is less than 120w or so.
So if you look at more normal, light work, 10700k is getting more work done per w. its only worst case then its using 9.7x the power to achieve 9.7x performance.