Is there another way to achieve the functionality of std::optional without another object being c...
Channel:
Subscribers:
4,120
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmgHaARfc-0
Is there another way to achieve the functionality of std::optional without another object being created?
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
The Content (except music & images) is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing)CC BY-SA
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!
(stackoverflow.com/users/12304314/jo3kerr)Jo3kerR
(stackoverflow.com/users/2610810/caleth)Caleth
(stackoverflow.com/users/16649550/pepijn-kramer)Pepijn Kramer
A special thanks goes out to the (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77655186/is-there-another-way-to-achieve-the-functionality-of-stdoptional-without-anoth)Stackexchange community
I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)
c++ stdoptional
Other Videos By Peter Schneider
Tags:
c++
stdoptional