Duration: 3:14

1,183 views

21

Does our knowledge of the Constellations prove Flat Earth theory. Our modern constellations have been mapped for years, yet we have perceived no change, even though we have traveled millions of miles during that period. Think of over 60 thousand miles per hour, over the course of thousands of years.

Is it possible that the Magdelanian cave drawings prove Flat Earth? These are the last of the paleolithic civilizations. The excuse that the stars are so far away, so we would not perceive a change, is just pain bull. That "could" be the case if the reference stars were close together themselves and on simliar planes. As reality stands, this is not the case. Each one of those stars is likely another solar system, or galaxy.

Each solary system and galaxy is at a different angle, and a different distance. For this reason alone, I believe that we would have to had seen movement in the constellations if we were hurtling through the cosmos at a fast rate over thousands of years.

Yet, the only perception that we have, is rotation. How can this not be obvious and the telltale signs that only the sky rotates overhead. Of course this could be our rotation, or the sky could rotate over us. The least likely (or possible considering the observed star movement), is that we are hurtling through space while rotating and moving around the sun. We don't even see the movement around the sun. ALL that we see in the sky is rotation. Just let that sink in.

It's not because it's such a big cosmos, or that we are so small. We would see the effects. Look at timelapse photos of the night sky, it's simple circular rotation. It would have an elliptical rotation if we had any lateral movement. It's simple physics, yet they use physics and the theory of gravity to solidify your faith in their false idol.

I wish you luck with your research, and I pray that you keep an open mind to opinions other than your own, because we all an learn more, and we all have the possibility of being wrong.