Quantifying the dynamics of failure across science, startups and security | AISC

Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6pTtOmIZRo



Duration: 54:13
401 views
10


For slides and more information on the paper, visit https://aisc.ai.science/events/2020-02-19

Discussion lead: Yian Yin
Discussion facilitator(s): Ehsan Amjadian

Motivation:
Human achievements are often preceded by repeated attempts that initially fail, yet little is known about the mechanisms governing the dynamics of failure. Here, building on the rich literature on innovation, human dynamics and learning, we develop a simple one-parameter model that mimics how successful future attempts build on those past. Analytically solving this model reveals a phase transition that separates dynamics of failure into regions of stagnation or progression, predicting that near the critical threshold, agents who share similar characteristics and learning strategies may experience fundamentally different outcomes following failures. Below the critical point, we see those who explore disjoint opportunities without a pattern of improvement, and above it, those who exploit incremental refinements to systematically advance toward success. The model makes several empirically testable predictions, demonstrating that those who eventually succeed and those who do not may be initially similar, yet are characterized by fundamentally distinct failure dynamics in terms of the efficiency and quality of each subsequent attempt. We collected large-scale data from three disparate domains, tracing repeated attempts by (i) NIH investigators to fund their research, (ii) innovators to successfully exit their startup ventures, and (iii) terrorist organizations to post casualties in violent attacks, finding broadly consistent empirical support across all three domains. Together, our findings unveil identifiable yet previously unknown early signals that allow us to identify failure dynamics that will lead to ultimate victory or defeat. Given the ubiquitous nature of failures and the paucity of quantitative approaches to understand them, these results represent a crucial step toward deeper understanding of the complex dynamics beneath failures, the essential prerequisites for success.




Other Videos By LLMs Explained - Aggregate Intellect - AI.SCIENCE


2020-03-09Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning |
2020-03-04Can deep learning AI help with detecting COVID-19/coronavirus?
2020-03-03Daniel Lemire: The research paper should NOT be the final product | AISC
2020-02-29Model Packaging Overview (NLP + MLOps workshop sneak peak)
2020-02-26[hgraph2graph] Hierarchical Generation of Molecular Graphs using Structural Motifs | AISC Spotlight
2020-02-25AISC | Women in AI | Dec 2019
2020-02-25Build and Deploy NLP models | NLP Overview
2020-02-25Protein secondary structure detection in intermediate-resolution cryo-EM maps using deep learning |
2020-02-24[AI Product] How to build products people actually want to use | AISC
2020-02-20Build and Deploy Machine Learning Models | MLOps Overview
2020-02-19Quantifying the dynamics of failure across science, startups and security | AISC
2020-02-18Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematics | AISC
2020-02-12Visualizing and measuring the geometry of BERT | AISC
2020-02-11Attention is not not explanation + Character Eyes: Seeing Language through Character-Level Taggers |
2020-02-10Single Headed Attention RNN: Stop Thinking With Your Head | AISC
2020-01-27Identifying Big ML product opportunities inside Big organizations | AISC
2020-01-23Machine Learning in Cyber Security, Overview | AISC
2020-01-22BottleSum: Unsupervised & Self-supervised Sentence Summarization w/ Information Bottleneck Principle
2020-01-20A Hybrid GA-PSO Method for Evolving Architecture and Short Connections of Deep Convolutional Neural
2020-01-13Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generation | AISC
2020-01-08Overview of Modern Anomaly and Novelty Detection | AISC