Results of a Comparative Study on FastSuperposition, Superposition Algorithm in Intensity Modulated

Channel:
India BP International
Subscribers:
9,250
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3pg3Ry6wJs


Duration: 0:00
11 views
0

Results of a Comparative Study on Fast Superposition, Superposition Algorithm in Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Prostate Cancer

This study aims to compare the dosimetric coverage of the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and the dose to main organs at risk (OARs) between two dif-ferent algorithms fast superposition (FSUP), superposition (SUP) using in-tensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques for prostate cancer. Ten patients with prostate cancer were selected for this study. For each patient, IMRT plans were created with 6 MV photon beam quality using CMS XiO treatment planning system. The delivery of IMRT was carried out using the step and shoot techniques. The dose coverage for each patient was designated to an ICRU report 62 reference point in the PTV, medium coverage of the planned target volume to be 95% of the prescribed dose while the maximum dose in the target volume to be not greater than 107% of the prescribed dose. A hypofractionated prescription dose of 70 Gy/28# at 2.5 Gy per fraction was used. For target, this evalua-tion was made with comparing the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). The results of the present study showed the OARs got less dose from the SUP algorithm compared to FSUP algorithms. Statistically not significant difference was observed in V107% of PTV, MU/CC, conformity Index (p = 0.057, p = 0.215, p = 0.370) and 95% PTV Volume received prescription dose from both Plans. For prostate cancer, the superposition algorithm showed better results in the IMRT plan compared to the fast superposition algorithm.

#Prostatecancer #IMRT #algorithm #MUs #conformityindex #homogeneityindex

Please See the book here
https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/270



Other Videos By BP International


2021-01-15Investigating the Systems Biology in the Context of Big Data, Statistics and Networks
2021-01-15Marine Zooplankton from Bashayer Marine Terminaland Abo Hashish along the Sudanese Red Sea Coast
2021-01-14Mild Dehydration and Apparent Relationship with Bladder and Colorectal Cancers
2021-01-14From Selective Cardiovascular Cells Adhesion to Regulating “Spatiotemporal Orderliness of Function”
2021-01-14Peripheral Signs of Lymphocytopoiesis in the Prediction of the Terminal Life Span of Cancer Patients
2021-01-14Recent Study on the Feasibility of High Spatial Resolution Working Modes for Renovated Clinical PET
2021-01-14Investigation on the Usefulness of Serum Sorbitoland Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
2021-01-14A Review on Portal Biliopathy: Imaging Features ofNine Patients
2021-01-14Dosimetric Analysis of Three Different Sets of Five and Seven Fields IMRT Plans for Prostate Cancer
2021-01-14Preliminary Studies on Piliostigma thonningiiSchum Leaf Extract: Phytochemical Screening
2021-01-14Results of a Comparative Study on FastSuperposition, Superposition Algorithm in Intensity Modulated
2021-01-14Detailed Account of a Demographic Study ofThoracolumbar Junction Fracture in a Developing Country
2021-01-14Report on the Cryptococcal Meningitis in Patientwith Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
2021-01-14Comparative Study: Local Consolidation Therapyversus Observation for Oligometastatic Non SmallCell
2021-01-14Description of 8 Years Observational Study on Colorectal Cancer in UAE
2021-01-14Establishing the Correlation of End Tidal CarbonDioxide with Arterial Carbon Dioxide
2021-01-14Contemporary Total Hip Replacement: A Basic Science Perspective
2021-01-14Emphasizing the World-Universe Model Predictions
2021-01-14Discussion on World-Universe Model—Alternative to Big Bang Model
2021-01-14Optimization of a Three-Axes Teslameter for the Calibration of the Next Generation Undulators
2021-01-14Relativity with a Preferred Frame