Software Recorder Test (PlaysTV Vs Action!)
Plays.TV on the Left
Action! on the right
Both set to maximum quality.
We can see that plays.TV consumes much less framerate comparing to the Action!, but its far from a smooth experience on my system
End Results:
Action!: 61FPS
Plays.TV: 65FPS
W/O Recording: 71FPS
Even with Action! consuming more frames, i feel more confortable in having a recorder that delivers smoothness in the videos.
PC Specs:
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 945 3.0 @ 3.6 1.425V
Ram: 4x2 gb GSkill DDR III 1318 CL8
MBoard: Asus M4A785TD-M Evo
GPU: Gigabyte HD 7850 OC 2Gb (975/1200)
HDD: WD Blue 500Gb
PSU: Corsair TX-650W
Software:
Game: The Talos Principle (64 bits)
GPU Drivers: AMD Catalyst 16.4.1
OS: Windows 10 PRO (DreamSpark License)
Monitor Stats: MSI Afterburner 4.2.0
Video Recorder: Mirillis Action! 1.30.3 & Plays.TV 1.9.2
Data Organizer and Cloud: Microsoft Office 365
Video Editor: WonderShare Filmora 6.8