What Is Hierarchy of Disagreement? Explained In Hindi
1Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement Explained In Hindi
Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/ai.moun/
@ai.moun
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/aimoun2019
Twitter : https://twitter.com/AiMoun100
@AiMoun100
Displate : https://displate.com/ai1
Social Blade: https://socialblade.com/youtube/c/aimoun
Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement is a model that outlines different levels of argumentation in a discussion or debate. The model was created by Paul Graham, a computer scientist, entrepreneur, and writer. According to Graham, there are seven levels of disagreement, from the least effective to the most effective:
Name-calling: This is the lowest level of disagreement, and it involves using personal insults, ad hominem attacks, and other forms of verbal abuse. It is not effective in persuading others or advancing the discussion.
Ad hominem: This level of disagreement involves attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself. It is still not effective in advancing the discussion.
Responding to tone: This level of disagreement involves reacting to the tone of the argument, rather than its substance. It is also not effective in advancing the discussion.
Contradiction: This level of disagreement involves contradicting the argument directly, pointing out its flaws and weaknesses. It is a more effective way to engage in a discussion, but it is still not the most effective.
Counterargument: This level of disagreement involves presenting a counterargument to the original argument, offering an alternative perspective or solution. It is a more effective way to engage in a discussion and can help move the discussion forward.
Refutation: This level of disagreement involves refuting the original argument with evidence, logic, and facts. It is a very effective way to engage in a discussion and can help persuade others to your point of view.
Rebuilding: This is the highest level of disagreement, and it involves rebuilding the argument from scratch, taking into account the flaws and weaknesses of the original argument. It is the most effective way to engage in a discussion, as it requires a deep understanding of the original argument and a willingness to engage with it on a fundamental level.
In summary, Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement provides a useful framework for engaging in constructive discussions and debates, by outlining the most effective and least effective ways to respond to arguments. By striving to engage at the higher levels of disagreement, we can have more productive and meaningful discussions, and ultimately arrive at more informed and nuanced perspectives.