28 Jan 2021. Livestream with Alex in the Studio, Continuing talking the discussion on antennae
24Stated Clear Intention.
Livestream with Alex. We were originally going to discuss the Antenna system.
** ** **
What is meant by: 5D ? "fifth dimension" ? fifth density?
We hear regularly such phrases as "I know I'm not in 5D yet, but...".
One feels as if the fifth dimension is an actual thing, or a place we are going to; such as would be an example of us in a boat arriving at a shore, or pier, mooring, or dock, or some port.
For the purposes of this discussion, we call "5D" fifth dimension. Third density, and fifth density as concepts, are not discussed here.
At current, understanding of this phrase '5D,' or 'Fifth Dimension' is based upon a tacit understanding that one "knows" ; that we both assume a common meaning, sharing the exact understanding, of the previous 4 dimensions.
Yet, at a certain point we run into a wall of rhetorical constraint, which balks at 'the battering-ram of' meaning. What are the previous 4 dimensions?
We need to define our lexicon of terminology. A lexicon is a shared,common vocabulary
If I have LxWxH as my proper first three dimensions, then where do I go from there?
Part A: Un-learn.; attempts to break the linguistical spell imposed by Original Mason's veil of ignorance imposed upon the "masses"/"sheep", as promulgated by Teaching Institutions.
We may be moving into 5D... but do you want to be inconvenienced by this inconvenient inevitability?
This conversation is difficult, as it requires individuals to un-know, or relearn what has been imposed by Original Mason's teaching Institutions, based upon words, and linguistic impositions upon students.
There's a two-part, two step process in First principle of Using Dimensions; [A: Un-learn. B: Re-fashion.]
We are at the stage of re-structuring our "logical grid", starting with the language used in its constructioning.
** ** ** **
yt channel: (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2yopCLcJ9YU7JpRRGH7uAw)
** *** ***
We are telling you how to properly read report, and the limitations of these sensors. The nature of this job IS technical, and scientific. I am not operating in a belief bubble in reviewing the machines, and equipment; or otherwise, I would not be able to tell you the readings properly. My job IS to tell you "that's not what the machines are saying".
** **
Cumiana, as part of the CIEN network of detector sites, measures the Electrical component, as this is what accompanies earthquake behaviour.
At the bottom of this post, is an excerpt from the conclusion of C. Fidani in his symposium of the connection with earthquakes, seismicity, and signatures at the VLF, and ELF band of frequencies; based on research at CIEN.
Tomsk, Russia, is a part of the Space Observing System, within the Tomsk State University. This station is a dedicated Schumann Resonance station, which measures the horizontal (quality) up to 40Hertz, and the Vertical (Amplitude) up to 200 deci-Bels pico-electron-Volts.
Tomsk SU has a more "modest instrumentation," as theirs is a site dedicated to only the dedicated spectrum of Schumann Energies; the resonant harmonics of which extend to ~46 Hz, in the horizontal frequency.
** ** **
The first lesson of understanding the Schumann resonances is "examine your local environment first. Examine the local weather at the antenna-detector state, secondly. Compare the two, thirdly. Your results may vary from what it says in Russia."
** ** **
** ** **
Latest Schumann Update:
Disclosure News : ( https://www.disclosurenews.it/sresonance/sr-last.jpg )
Tomsk Observatory: ( http://sosrff.tsu.ru/new/shm.jpg )
** ** ** **
Join the Schumann Resonance Harmonics group on facebook: (https://www.facebook.com/groups/2676680402574660)
** ** **
To support this work, please consider donating:
Patreon: ( https://www.patreon.com/SR_Harmonics )
Paypal: (paypal.me/vertarbusto)
cashapp: ($VertArbusto)