5 IMPROVEMENTS to One D&D that WOTC is not considering ("Lawyer's Critique")

Channel:

The Rules Lawyer

Subscribers:

47,200

Published on December 3, 2022 1:47:35 AM ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59ewz8CjgzY

Game:

Hearthstone (2014)

Duration: 11:38

6,322 views

457

Jeremy Crawford has, after much demand, stated some design goals for 6th edition of D&D (while not calling it a new edition). This is a step forward, but WOTC's current commitment to a conservative revision is leaving intact a number of core issues with the game that I deep-dive in my other videos. But even assuming a conservative revision, there are some glaring issues that 5e players and DMs have complained about, that some simple changes could help address.

However, they are things that should be brought up early in a playtest, and not later. I go into more detail in the video.

0:00 Intro
1:57 #1 - Separate ASIs from Feats
3:52 #2 - Unique Class Spells
5:02 #3 - Remove Instant Death
7:05 #4 - Remove Binary Saving Throws
9:04 #5 - Class capstones worth getting

===========================

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE! I'm a lawyer who teaches and runs tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder, D&D, Starfinder) for kids and teens, making videos and hosting events related to TTRPGs and board games.

JOIN THE DISCORD to game with our community and join The Endless Tale Tavern PF2e campaign! https://discord.gg/bpyqxhwe8X

SUPPORT THE RULES LAWYER PATREON!
https://www.patreon.com/theruleslawyer

Follow me on TWITTER at: https://twitter.com/theruleslawyer1

Other Statistics