A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Unigine Superposition
12Although synthetic benchmarks are targeting high-end GPUs, it's interesting how CPUs with integrated graphics can handle these kind of workloads. Unigine Superposition features state of the art effects to render remarkable visuals.
Intel i3-6100 was able to perform much closer to AMD A10-7860K compared to gaming scenarios. APUs used to hammer Intel's integrated graphics in computational tasks like LuxMark or other OpenCL based applications. But the drivers released by Intel at the end of 2016 brought huge performance uplift for the blue chips. Overall, in Unigine's latest Superposition benchmark the Radeon R7 is only 10% faster than the HD 530.
0:17 FTA
3:12 results
Intel slim-SFF build:
CASE + PSU: InWin BQ660 + 150W Internal PSU
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-WIFI Mini ITX LGA1151
CPU: Intel Core i3-6100 3.7GHz
GPU: integrated - Intel HD Graphics 530
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 3000MHz
STORAGE: Samsung m.2 SATA 500GB SSD 850 EVO
COOLER: SCYTHE Kozuti
AMD slim-SFF build:
CASE + PSU: InWin BQ660 + 150W Internal PSU
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI Mini ITX FM2+
CPU: AMD A10-7860K 3.6 Ghz/4.0 GHz
GPU: integrated - AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
RAM: G.SKILL Ares 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 2400MHz
STORAGE: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 2.5" SATA III 500GB
COOLER: Noctua NH-L9a AMD CPU Cooler
A dedicated recording PC with a capture card was used to save the game footages and consequently no performance penalty was incurred on the reviewed systems. For convenience, games are installed on an external SSD and connected to the reviewed PC via USB3.0 interface.
Don't forget to like and subscribe, visit http://boostclock.com for more information / detailed charts!