Duration: 4:08

2,918 views

129

Right there in the title.

Sorry I don't have something more substantial, hope you like it


The Lightning Rod uses heavily, HEAVILY edited clips, many of which are narrated over, for the purposes of education, criticism, and commentary, and as such should fall under "fair use." They do not, and should not, serve as a substitute for the work in question. Duh.
Copyright disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for the "fair use" of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Got that, YouTube?
Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material WITHOUT REQUIRING PERMISSION FROM THE RIGHTS HOLDERS, SUCH AS COMMENTARY, CRITICISM, NEWS REPORTING, RESEARCH, TEACHING OR SCHOLARSHIP. It provides for legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor balancing test, which I assure you, this meets all the criteria of.

I shouldn't be having to state the obvious but Youtube is stupid and uses automated content ID technology so really what's the point even of writing this they're probably gonna copyright strike the shit out of me anyway cuz they love slurping big fat meaty c*cks