Almost Tight Error Bounds on Differentially Private Continual Counting

Subscribers:
348,000
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqOrBGAlsRE



Duration: 56:20
228 views
8


A Google TechTalk, presented by Jalaj Upadhyay (Rutgers), 2023/05/03
ABSTRACT: Differentially private continual observation has gained renewed interest due to its wide applications, most notably in large-scale private optimization. In this case, a concrete bound on the error is very relevant to reduce the privacy parameter. The standard mechanism for continual counting is the binary mechanism. We present a novel mechanism and show that its mean squared error is both asymptotically optimal and a factor 10 smaller than the error of the binary mechanism. We also show that the constants in our analysis are almost tight by giving non-asymptotic lower and upper bounds that differ only in the constants of lower-order terms. Our algorithm is a matrix mechanism for the counting matrix and takes constant time per release. We also use our explicit factorization of the counting matrix to give an upper bound on the excess risk of the private learning algorithm of Denisov et al. (NeurIPS 2022). Our lower bound for any continual counting mechanism is the first tight lower bound on continual counting under approximate differential privacy. It is achieved using a new lower bound on a factorization norm in terms of the singular values of the matrix. We believe this technique will be useful in proving lower bounds for a larger class of linear queries. To illustrate the power of this technique, we show the first lower bound on the mean squared error for answering parity queries. Time permitting, we will show some new results for factorization norm of a more general class of matrix that allows us to perform counting under decaying sum.

Joint work with Monika Henzinger and Sarvagya Upadhyay.




Other Videos By Google TechTalks


2023-06-29A Constant Factor Prophet Inequality for Online Combinatorial Auctions
2023-06-21Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability: A Whirlwind Tour
2023-06-11Online Prediction in Sub-linear Space
2023-06-06Accelerating Transformers via Kernel Density Estimation Insu Han
2023-06-06Differentially Private Synthetic Data via Foundation Model APIs
2023-06-05Foundation Models and Fair Use
2023-05-30Differentially Private Online to Batch
2023-05-30Differentially Private Diffusion Models Generate Useful Synthetic Images
2023-05-30Improving the Privacy Utility Tradeoff in Differentially Private Machine Learning with Public Data
2023-05-30Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accounting
2023-05-30Almost Tight Error Bounds on Differentially Private Continual Counting
2023-05-30EIFFeL: Ensuring Integrity for Federated Learning
2023-05-30Differentially Private Diffusion Models
2023-05-15Damian Grimling | Sentistocks | Sentimenti | web3 talks | March 9th 2023 | MC: Blake DeBenon
2023-04-21Branimir Rakic | CTO & Co-Founder of OriginTrail | web3 talks | Feb 27th 2023 | MC: Alex Ticamera
2023-04-15A Nearly Tight Analysis of Greedy k-means++
2023-04-15Introduction to Length-Constrained Expanders and Expander Decompositions
2023-04-07Improved Feature Importance Computation for Tree Models Based on the Banzhaf Value
2023-04-07A Unifying Theory of Distance to Calibration
2023-04-07Dynamic Graph Sketching: To Infinity And Beyond
2023-03-20Sergey Nazarov | Co-Founder Chainlink | web3 talks | Mar 16 2023 | MC: Marlon Ruiz