"Bad Students, Not Bad Schools" By Robert Weissberg
In his article "Bad Students, Not Bad Schools," Robert Weissberg delves into the contentious issue of educational achievement, attributing the problem not to inadequate schools but to the quality of students themselves. Weissberg's argument challenges prevailing notions that underperforming schools are solely responsible for the academic failures of students, asserting that the characteristics and behavior of students play a significant role in their success or failure in the educational system.
Weissberg begins by emphasizing the conventional belief that schools are the primary culprits for poor academic outcomes. He recognizes the inherent flaws in this perspective and proceeds to dismantle it by arguing that schools, as institutions, are not inherently flawed. He contends that the educational system, in principle, provides ample resources, dedicated teachers, and a comprehensive curriculum, rendering it far from inadequate. Weissberg's assertion that the schools themselves are not the issue aligns with the idea that blaming institutions simplifies a complex problem, diverting attention from students' own responsibilities.
The crux of Weissberg's argument lies in his assertion that students' attributes, behaviors, and attitudes play a pivotal role in their academic success or failure. He argues that factors such as parental involvement, a strong work ethic, and discipline are crucial determinants of students' performance. Weissberg contends that students from households with low academic aspirations are more likely to perform poorly in school. Furthermore, he highlights the significance of parental involvement, suggesting that parents who prioritize education tend to have children who perform better academically.
Weissberg also delves into the contentious issue of cultural factors, arguing that some cultures place a higher value on education than others. He suggests that students hailing from cultures that emphasize hard work and academic achievement tend to excel in the American educational system, regardless of their socioeconomic background. This assertion leads Weissberg to a somewhat controversial standpoint, suggesting that culture might be a significant contributing factor to the educational achievement gap.
Weissberg recognizes that socioeconomic factors play a role in students' performance, but he contends that these factors are not insurmountable barriers. He argues that students from disadvantaged backgrounds can overcome these challenges through hard work, discipline, and a commitment to education. In doing so, he challenges the prevailing narrative that socioeconomic status alone determines a student's academic future. He emphasizes that the notion of the "self-made person" is not entirely obsolete in contemporary society.
Weissberg further explores the idea of student behavior and discipline. He contends that students who exhibit poor behavior and a lack of discipline are more likely to perform poorly academically. He asserts that schools cannot be held responsible for the discipline of individual students and that it is the students themselves who must take responsibility for their actions and their impact on their academic success.
Weissberg's argument ultimately calls for a shift in perspective when addressing educational issues. He suggests that the blame placed on schools and teachers is misguided and unproductive. Instead, he urges society to focus on the responsibility of students and their parents in ensuring academic success. This perspective is a call to action, emphasizing that improving the educational system requires a fundamental shift in the values and attitudes of students and their families.
In conclusion, Robert Weissberg's article "Bad Students, Not Bad Schools" provides a thought-provoking analysis of the factors influencing educational achievement. His argument challenges the prevalent belief that underperforming schools are solely responsible for the academic struggles of students. Weissberg asserts that students' attributes, behaviors, and attitudes, as well as their family and cultural backgrounds, are equally, if not more, influential in determining their success in the educational system. While his perspective may be contentious, it prompts a reevaluation of how we approach and address educational issues, emphasizing the importance of personal responsibility and the role of families and communities in fostering academic success.