C++ : Rule "A user-defined but do-nothing destructor is also a non-trivial destructor" is too strict
C++ : Rule "A user-defined but do-nothing destructor is also a non-trivial destructor" is too strict?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
As promised, I'm going to share a hidden feature with you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure the video is currently in playing mode.
Then, type the letters 'awesome' on the keyboard.
You will see a flashing rainbow instead of a regular progress bar on YouTube.
Let me give you a quick introduction about myself,
Hello there, my name is Delphi.
Allow me to provide support in answering your questions.
C++ : Rule "A user-defined but do-nothing destructor is also a non-trivial destructor" is too strict?
I welcome your comments and chats if you have more detailed queries.
Your thoughts and contributions are welcome, so please leave a comment below if you have an answer or insights to the answer.
Your answer will be recognized and appreciated, and I will 'heart' it to show my appreciation.
strict? "A a too user-defined non-trivial is Rule C++ : is but destructor do-nothing also destructor"