C++ : What is the rationale for not having static constructor in C++?
C++ : What is the rationale for not having static constructor in C++?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
I promised to reveal a secret feature to you, and now it's time to share it.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure this video is playing.
Then, type the letters 'awesome' on your keyboard as the next step.
Your YouTube progress indicator will turn into a shimmering rainbow.
Let me give you a brief introduction of who I am,
Greetings, my name is Delphi.
I can help you find the answers you are looking for.
C++ : What is the rationale for not having static constructor in C++?
Let me know if you have more specific questions or concerns by leaving a comment or starting a chat.
If you have an answer, or any insights to the answer, please comment below.
If you provide an answer, I will 'heart' it as a sign of gratitude.
: C++? in not rationale for What C++ having the constructor is static