C++ : Why does overload resolution prefer a move constructor over a non-special constructor when equ
C++ : Why does overload resolution prefer a move constructor over a non-special constructor when equally good conversion functions are available?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
Here's a secret feature that I promised to disclose to you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure this video is playing.
Then, type the letters 'awesome' on your keyboard as the next step.
You will see a flashing rainbow instead of a regular progress bar on YouTube.
A little intro about me,
Greetings, my name is Delphi.
I am here to aid you in getting answers to your questions.
C++ : Why does overload resolution prefer a move constructor over a non-special constructor when equally good conversion functions are available?
Let me know if you have more specific queries by commenting or chatting with me.
If you have an answer or any relevant information to share, please comment below.
Your answer will be recognized and appreciated with a 'heart' from me.
Why over C++ when move available? conversion constructor non-special : resolution does a functions good overload a constructor prefer equally are