C++ : Why does passing to a function a set::iterator instead of a const_iterator violate the One Def
C++ : Why does passing to a function a set::iterator instead of a const_iterator violate the One Definition Rule?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
I have a hidden feature that I promised to tell you about.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Ensure that the video is playing before proceeding.
Next, enter the letters 'awesome' on your keyboard.
It will change your youtube progress bar into a flashing rainbow.
Let me give you a quick introduction about myself,
Hello there, my name is Delphi.
I am available to help you find solutions to your inquiries.
C++ : Why does passing to a function a set::iterator instead of a const_iterator violate the One Definition Rule?
If you have more specific queries, please feel free to reach out through comments or chat.
Your thoughts and contributions are welcome, so please leave a comment below if you have an answer or insights to the answer.
Your answer will be recognized and valued, and I will 'heart' it to show my appreciation.
function a Rule? a : instead const_iterator does One of C++ violate the Why set::iterator passing Definition to a