Can experiments settle the free will debate? | Julian Baggini, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Sarah Garfinkel VIDEO
Julian Baggini, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Sarah Garfinkel debate whether science can shed a light of the free will conundrum.
If a machine could predict your actions, would you still be free?
Watch the full debate at https://iai.tv/video/the-future-of-freedom?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description
A famed experiment, by Libet in the 1980s, led many scientists and philosophers to argue that free will was an illusion. Despite the experiment being challenged at the time and in recent studies, its legacy persists. Many materialists still contend that free will has been shown to be illusory, supporting their belief that humans are merely biological machines. We often imagine that experiment settles the matter, but should we instead conclude that our interpretation of experiment is a function of our desire to believe its outcome? Or can empiricism really determine the existence or non-existence of free will?
#FreeWillExperiment #Empiricism #FreeWillDeterminism
Prolific British writer, philosopher and co-founder of The Philosophers’ Magazine, Julian Baggini, renowned Australian philosopher of science, Peter Godfrey-Smith, and leading British neuroscientist and UCL professor, Sarah Garfinkel, argue about empiricism and its role in determining the existence of free will. Alex O'Connor hosts.
The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today! https://iai.tv/subscribe?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=the-future-of-freedom
For debates and talks: https://iai.tv
For articles: https://iai.tv/articles
For courses: https://iai.tv/iai-academy/courses
Other Videos By The Institute of Art and Ideas 2023-06-20 How to find and make sense of happiness | Paul Dolan 2023-06-17 Is string theory a failing model? | Eric Weinstein and Brian Greene go head to head again 2023-06-15 A world by any other name | Arif Ahmed, Ruth Kempson, Hilary Lawson 2023-06-13 Logic for the Left | Ben Burgis 2023-06-10 Was the universe made for us? | Sabine Hossenfelder 2023-06-08 Is thought a distraction from reality? | Miranda Keeling, Steve Taylor and Andy West 2023-06-06 Sex and taboo in the modern age | Zoe Strimpel, Myriam François and Louise Perry 2023-06-03 Why Dawkins is wrong | Denis Noble interview 2023-06-01 The secrets of the universe | Harry Cliff 2023-05-30 Do we unfairly privilege the unelected? | Ben Burgis, Thangam Debbonaire and Nemone Metaxas 2023-05-27 Can experiments settle the free will debate? | Julian Baggini, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Sarah Garfinkel 2023-05-25 The theory to end all theories | Peter Woit, Becky Parker, Hilary Lawson 2023-05-23 Do our lives tell a story? | David Hare, Janne Teller and Sophie Fiennes 2023-05-21 Physics and the meaning of life PART 1 | Sabine Hossenfelder 2023-05-18 The ignorance of experts | Julian Baggini, Ellen Clarke, Ben Burgis 2023-05-15 Equality on the frontline | Mary Ann Sieghart, Minna Salami and Maya Oppenheim 2023-05-13 Is virtual reality real? | Anders Sandberg and Massimo Pigliucci clash over David Chalmers' position 2023-05-11 The medicine myth | Denis Noble, Nessa Carey, Guy Brown 2023-05-09 There is no Planet B | Mike Berners-Lee interview 2023-05-06 How to see the world through Kafka's eyes | Steven Berkoff 2023-05-04 How philosophy got lost | Slavoj Žižek interview
Tags: learning
education
debate
lecture
IAItv
institute of art and ideas
IAI
philosophy
julian baggini
Peter Godfrey-Smith
Sarah Garfinkel
philosophy debate
philosophy debate free will
free will
free will debate
determinism
empiricism
Can experiments settle the free will debate?
philosophy of life
can we make choices
experiments free will
julian baggini free will
peter godfrey smith theory and reality
neuroscience and free will - libets experiment
libets
predictability