Ewin Tang: Building a classical framework to analyze quantum machine learning speedups

Channel:
Subscribers:
2,450
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tit3G2UNOag



Duration: 43:50
994 views
0


An invited talk by Ewin Tang at the 14th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2019), Day 1. TQC 2019 was hosted June 3-5, 2019 by the Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science at the University of Maryland (QuICS). More information about TQC can be found at https://www.tqcconference.org.

Abstract: We cover some recent work on "dequantizing" QML algorithms and the set of classical length-squared sampling techniques used to achieve these results. First, we motivate the correspondence between QML with state preparation assumptions and classical ML with sampling assumptions. In the latter setting, we describe an algorithm toolkit which bears resemblance to quantum operations on classical distributions. Second, we describe the capabilities and limitations of these techniques in comparison with quantum computing, by considering their application to low-rank matrix inversion (1811.04909 and 1811.04852), supervised clustering (1811.00414), and recommendation systems (1807.04271). This theory of quantum-like classical sampling algorithms formalizes some intuition informing our evaluation of polylogarithmic-time QML algorithms as "good" or "bad". By comparing QML algorithms to classical ML algorithms strengthened with sampling assumptions, we can distinguish the speedups artificially created from quantum state preparation assumptions from the speedups that truly exploit the quantumness of the algorithm.




Other Videos By QuICS


2019-09-06Lorenza Viola: Noise characterization for NISQ processors (and beyond)
2019-09-06Peter Zoller: Hybrid Classical-Quantum Algorithms on Programmable Quantum Simulators
2019-09-06Mikhail Lukin: Programmable quantum simulators based on  Rydberg atom arrays
2019-09-06Chris Monroe: Scalable Quantum Computing with Atoms
2019-09-06Francois LeGall: Quantum Advantage for the LOCAL Model in Distributed Computing
2019-09-06Alexander Poremba: On Quantum Chosen-Ciphertext Attacks and Learning with Errors
2019-09-06Joel Wallman: Reconstructing Pauli Error Channels
2019-09-06Paola Capellaro: Hardware-Efficient quantum error correction codes
2019-09-06Robin Kothari: Quantum distinguishing complexity, zero-error algorithms & statistical zero knowledge
2019-09-06Albert H. Werner: Tensor network representations from the geometry of entangled states
2019-09-06Ewin Tang: Building a classical framework to analyze quantum machine learning speedups
2019-06-07NISQ Workshop Day 2
2019-06-06NISQ Workshop Day 1
2019-06-05TQC 2019 Day 3
2019-06-04TQC 2019: Day 2
2019-06-03TQC 2019 Day 1
2019-05-28Fred Chong: Closing the Gap between Quantum Algorithms and Machines with Hardware-Software Co-Design
2019-05-28Anurag Anshu: Quantum decoupling (...) and the entanglement cost of one-shot quantum protocols
2019-04-04Ramis Movassagh: Supercritical Entanglement: counter-examples to the area law for quantum matter
2019-03-29Serge Fehr: Security of the Fiat-Shamir Transformation in the Quantum Random Oracle Model
2018-10-31Mario Szegedy: A New Algorithm for Product Decomposition in Quantum Signal Processing