Serge Fehr: Security of the Fiat-Shamir Transformation in the Quantum Random Oracle Model

Channel:
Subscribers:
2,520
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dbFbpIYW_s



Duration: 1:03:55
522 views
0


Security of the Fiat-Shamir Transformation in the Quantum Random Oracle Model

In this presentation, I will first recall the Fiat-Shamir transformation, which is an important design principle for non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs and for digital signature schemes. In order to rigorously analyze the security of this transformation, one typically considers an idealized model, the so-called random oracle model (ROM), which treats cryptographic hash functions as ideal objects. It is well known that (in the ROM) the Fiat-Shamir transformation preserves the security properties one cares about. However, the proof for this result breaks down in the quantum setting where the attacker is allowed to make superposition queries to the random oracle. Indeed, the security of the Fiat-Shamir transformation against a quantum attack was largely open; only some limited results were know, and some negative claims were actually made in the literature. Having set up the stage, I will then discuss our recent result, which shows full-fledged security of the Fiat-Shamir transformation against quantum attacks, i.e., in the so-called quantum ROM. I will give some high-level intuition for our result, but will also go through the technical proof, which after all is quite simple. In the last part, I will briefly introduce a modification to a security definition for interactive proofs, which allows us to relativize a certain negative result, and which then makes our result on the Fiat-Shamir transformation relevant for a larger class of schemes.




Other Videos By QuICS


2019-09-06Tamara Kohler: Toy Models of Holographic Duality between local Hamiltonians
2019-09-06Patricia Tejada: Resource theory of entanglement with multipartite maximally entangled states
2019-06-07NISQ Workshop Day 2
2019-06-06NISQ Workshop Day 1
2019-06-05TQC 2019 Day 3
2019-06-04TQC 2019: Day 2
2019-06-03TQC 2019 Day 1
2019-05-28Fred Chong: Closing the Gap between Quantum Algorithms and Machines with Hardware-Software Co-Design
2019-05-28Anurag Anshu: Quantum decoupling (...) and the entanglement cost of one-shot quantum protocols
2019-04-04Ramis Movassagh: Supercritical Entanglement: counter-examples to the area law for quantum matter
2019-03-29Serge Fehr: Security of the Fiat-Shamir Transformation in the Quantum Random Oracle Model
2018-10-31Mario Szegedy: A New Algorithm for Product Decomposition in Quantum Signal Processing
2018-10-31Scott Aaronson: Gentle Measurement of Quantum States and Differential Privacy
2018-10-31Seth Lloyd: Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks
2018-10-31Norbert Linke: Quantum Machine Learning with Trapped Ions
2018-10-31Kristan Temme: Supervised Learning with Quantum Enhanced Feature Spaces
2018-10-31Soheil Feizi: Generative Adversarial Networks: Formulation, Design and Computation
2018-10-31Nathan Wiebe: Optimizing Quantum Optimization Algorithms via Faster Quantum Gradient Computation
2018-10-31Rolando Somma: Quantum Algorithms for Systems of Linear Equations
2018-10-31Anupam Praksah: A Quantum Interior Point Method for LPs and SDPs
2018-10-31Furong Huang: Discovery of Latent Factors in High-dimensional Data Using Tensor Methods