New Cache - FPS Tested

New Cache - FPS Tested

Channel:
Subscribers:
1,090,000
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2UoeRex6zA



Counter-Strike 2 - formerly Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO)
Game:
Duration: 7:05
187,958 views
8,593


How well does the new Cache for CS:GO run?

▶️ SUBSCRIBE TO 3KLIKSPHILIP : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmu9PVIZBk-ZCi-Sk2F2utA?sub_confirmation=1 for CS GO content
▶️ TWITTER: https://twitter.com/3kliksphilip
▶️ MY BROTHER'S CHANNEL : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEKJKJ3FO-9SFv5x5BzyxhQ?sub_confirmation=1

Annoyingly, minutes after concluding my testing the map got a small FPS optimisation. I doubt it will change the results TOO much, but just know that the map may be performing marginally better than it does in this video.
See Cache's latest updates here: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/changelog/1855851320
Also, I've realised that most of this video focuses on the GPU- honestly, any CPU released within the last 5 years should have the power to run it, provided it has at least 4 threads. And isn't bulldozer.
0:10 - The humble 2200G Test system
0:45 - 720p results with 2200G + onboard graphics
2:03 - 1080p results with 2200G + onboard graphics
2:59 - 1080p results with 2200G + Geforce 670
3:45 - What is needed for smooth 1080p 144 hz gaming GPU-wise?
4:07 - 1440p gaming
4:29 - What is needed for smooth 1440p 144 hz gaming, GPU-wise?
4:59 - New Cache VS other maps
5:33 - Conclusion, and does the FPS drop matter?
For this video, I did extensive testing. There were a lot of numbers, some of which I briefly touch upon in this video. In order to keep it understandable I have based this video around my narration, with the video simply there to show the figures that I'm talking about. I don't show ALL of the figures that go into what makes up the results. I stood in 21 set locations around each of the levels and recorded the framerates at those spots at different resolutions and quality settings. 3 would be in bombsite A, 3 would be at T Spawn etc, and the average of these made up the result for that 'location' on the map. I also got the average of all of these to get the 'average' for the map. I believe the results I get will nicely represent the performance you'll get on these maps- at least, when there aren't other players on the server, which is a variable I really didn't want to get into with the testing here.

See all data here: https://i.imgur.com/bRxyPE2.png
See locations tested here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CzWIn0fyGaVt0p2k8Cidjx48c7SXhSye3XkZvbKzlM8/edit?usp=sharing

Check out my channels:
● 3kliksphilip: https://www.youtube.com/3kliksphilip
● 2kliksphilip: https://www.youtube.com/2kliksphilip
● kliksphilip: https://www.youtube.com/kliksphilip

Other information you might like:
● Website: http://3kliksphilip.com
● Twitter: https://twitter.com/3kliksphilip
● PC Specs: Ryzen 3700X, 32 GB RAM, Geforce 2080 Ti







Tags:
de_cache
cache 2019
csgo 2019
csgo update
fmpone
cache fps
csgo fps
best pc
gpu
cpu
csgo cpu
csgo gpu
csgo cache



Other Statistics

Counter-Strike 2 Statistics For 3kliksphilip

At present, 3kliksphilip has 455,702,389 views spread across 1,069 videos for Counter-Strike 2, with the game making up over 3 days of published video on his channel. This is 82.48% of the total watchable video for Counter-Strike 2 on 3kliksphilip's YouTube channel.