Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviations with _mm_popc...

Subscribers:
4,130
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IMBKLWnu7A



Duration: 7:19
8 views
0


Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviations with _mm_popcnt_u64 on Intel CPUs
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
The Content (except music & images) is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing)CC BY-SA |
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!

(stackoverflow.com/users/1408611/gexicide)gexicide |
(stackoverflow.com/users/922184/mysticial)Mysticial |
(stackoverflow.com/users/3185968/eof)EOF |
(stackoverflow.com/users/1094101/non-maskable-interrupt)Non-maskable Interrupt |
(stackoverflow.com/users/3282056/rcgldr)rcgldr |
(stackoverflow.com/users/1161878/gene)Gene |
A special thanks goes out to the (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25078285/replacing-a-32-bit-loop-counter-with-64-bit-introduces-crazy-performance-deviati)Stackexchange community |

I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)

x86 performance assembly compiler-optimization c++







Tags:
x86
performance
assembly
compiler-optimization
c++