Robert Huang:  Fundamental aspects of solving quantum problems with machine learning

Robert Huang: Fundamental aspects of solving quantum problems with machine learning

Channel:
Subscribers:
2,450
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VazUK13iwpQ



Duration: 1:01:35
870 views
0


Machine learning (ML) provides the potential to solve challenging quantum many-body problems in physics and chemistry. Yet, this prospect has not been fully justified. In this work, we establish rigorous results to understand the power of classical ML and the potential for quantum advantage in an important example application: predicting outcomes of quantum mechanical processes. We prove that for achieving a small average prediction error, one can always design a classical ML model whose sample complexity is comparable to the best quantum ML model (up to a small polynomial factor). Regarding computational complexity, we show that the class of problems that can be solved by efficient classical ML models with access to sampled data is strictly larger than BPP. Hence, classical ML models may be able to solve some challenging quantum problems after training from data obtained in physical experiments. As a concrete example, we prove that a simple, classical ML model can efficiently learn to predict ground state representations that approximate expectation values of local observables up to a small, constant error. This holds for any smooth family of gapped local Hamiltonians in a finite spatial dimension. This talk includes content from [1], [2], and [3].

[1] Huang, Hsin-Yuan, Richard Kueng, and John Preskill. "Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning." arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.02464 (2021).
[2] Huang, Hsin-Yuan, et al. "Power of data in quantum machine learning." arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.01938 (2020).
[3] Huang, Hsin-Yuan, Richard Kueng, and John Preskill. "Provable machine learning algorithms for quantum many-body problems." In preparation.




Other Videos By QuICS


2021-12-02Tobias Osborne: Simulating conformal field theories
2021-12-02Nolan Coble: IQC-QuICS Math-CS Seminar
2021-11-29Mina Doosti: Quantum Physical Unclonable Functions and Their Comprehensive Cryptanalysis
2021-10-06Victor Albert: Overview of quantum research at UMD
2021-09-30Nicolas Delfosse: Improved quantum error correction using soft information
2021-05-05Tamara Kohler and Emilio Onorati: Fitting quantum noise models to tomography data
2021-04-14Sisi Zhou: Error-corrected quantum metrology
2021-03-28Martin Fraas: Quantized quantum transport in interacting systems
2021-03-12Michael DeMarco: A Commuting Projector Model for Hall Conductance
2021-03-09Daniel Stilck França: Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices
2021-03-09Robert Huang: Fundamental aspects of solving quantum problems with machine learning
2020-11-04Wolfgang Pfaff: Increasing connectivity and modularity in superconducting quantum circuits
2020-10-29Iordanis Kerenidis: Quantum Machine Learning: prospects and challenges
2020-10-21Urmila Mahadev: Classical homomorphic encryption for quantum circuits
2020-10-08Thomas Baker: Density functionals, Kohn-Sham potentials & Green’s functions from a quantum computer
2020-09-23James D. Whitfield: Limitations of Hartree-Fock with Quantum Resources
2020-09-18Mark Wilde: Quantum Renyi relative entropies and their use
2020-08-17Dmitry Green: A superconducting circuit realization of combinatorial gauge symmetry
2020-07-23Matt Hastings: The Power of Adiabatic Quantum Computation with No Sign Problem
2020-06-19William Slofstra: Arkhipov's theorem, games, groups, and graphs
2020-06-10Ramis Movassagh:Cayley path & quantum supremacy:Average case # P-Hardness of random circuit sampling



Tags:
quantum computing