The Basis for Condemnation: John 3:18 - Irrefutable Evidence for Eternal Security

Subscribers:
31,700
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqzjWPcF7b0



Duration: 9:46
507 views
38


John 3:18
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

We find the basis for positional condemnation in John 3:18. Those that are not condemned (regenerated and therefore predestined for glorification) are those that have believed.

When a person trusts Jesus Christ for everlasting life, they are passed from death unto life (John 5:24). This means believers are in the life now. This refutes the notion that says everlasting life is not something the believer has until future. Eternal life is the present possession of the believer. The Bible says "now are we the sons of God" (1 John 3:2). The aspect of salvation that is future is final sanctification (glorification). This is the salvation of our bodies (Romans 8:23). Believers are justified (legally declared righteous). We are born again (regenerated). We are being sanctified (set apart). And we will be glorified (final sanctification). Glorification is when our condition fully conforms to our position in Christ. The moment someone is justified, they have a new destiny. And that destiny is to glorification (Romans 8:30). God will not abort the work that He has begun in believers. God justified. He regenerated. And He will glorify.

The basis for condemnation is belief. Those that are condemned are those that "hath not believed" (John 3:18). This means we have two positional categories. These categories comprise those that have believed and those that "hath not believed" or have never believed. John 3:18 puts an end to the once saved always saved versus conditional security debate.

Those that hold to conditional security (the false doctrine that says a believer can lose his regeneration) argue that when a born-again Christian stops believing (will a believer stop believing is a greater question), or walks too much in the flesh (resulting in too much sin), they will lose their regeneration. They assert that a believer can go from life back to a state of death. John 3:18 (which gives us the basis for condemnation) provides us with two positional categories. To reiterate, the two categories are those that are condemned (have never believed) and those that are not condemned (the believing ones). Where is this hypothetical category of people who apparently believed, got saved, stopped believing and therefore lost of their salvation? Positionally, we have those condemned (for having never believed) and those that are not condemned (having believed). The moment someone trusts Jesus Christ and His finished work, they have everlasting life. This is life that never ends.

Proponents of conditional security have an impossible challenge in interpreting this important text in light of their doctrinal starting point. John 3:18 precludes conditional security from being true. This passage alone effectively falsifies the soteriological position of conditional security. It is impossible to argue that somebody could lose their salvation since they would first have to believe, then stop believing, and as a result become condemned again. But you could not say that these people "hath not believed". This is simply because they did believe. And condemnation (going to the lake of fire) is reserved for those who have never believed. And so even a person experiencing a lapse of faith cannot be said to be condemned, since they fall into the first category, which is the category of the "believing ones".

***FOR FULL WRITTEN POST, SEE PINNED COMMENT OF THIS VIDEO.***

To Support the Ministry:
https://www.paypal.com/donate/?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=GZN7E2UQR2QKS&source=url

Standing For Truth Ministries OFFICIAL Website:
https://standingfortruthministries.com/

Support Standing For Truth:
https://creationistclothing.com/pages/donate
https://www.patreon.com/darwindebunked

Interviews Hosted by Standing For Truth:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeROpayG6Sh0PZd0LDKqj19rqIU1HTh6i

Debates hosted/moderated by Standing For Truth:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeROpayG6Sh1xeSbKr2HsMPp8heWU7kaN

DISCLAIMER - The views shared by guests on Standing For Truth are not necessarily representative of the views of Donny and Standing For Truth Ministries.

The Evolution CHALLENGE:
https://standingfortruthministries.com/the-evolution-challenge-debates/
PLAYLIST: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeROpayG6Sh310HrOcukN8MooaHnmcRKI

End Times Theology Dawn of the Antichrist (Book by Donny Budinsky):
Black and White - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BJ7YGBGH
Full Colour - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BJC3NFCQ

The Endogenous Retrovirus Handbook (Dismantling the Best Evidence for Common Descent):
Black and White version - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B14KHL8G
Full Color Version plus Variant Cover - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B1B1N8F6




Other Videos By Standing For Truth


2024-03-17Debating 2 Peter 2:20 - The True Meaning of "latter end is worse with them than the beginning"
2024-03-16Biblical Salvation | The Aspects of Salvation in Under 60 Seconds
2024-03-16Debating the Book of Life & OT Salvation | Once Saved Always Saved VS. Conditional Security
2024-03-15DEBATE: Is Full Preterism Biblical? - ProfessingPreterist vs. Pastor Anthony Aquino
2024-03-15Is Homology Good Evidence for Evolution? Addressing Viced Rhino & Khan Academy
2024-03-14The REAL TRUTH About Carbon Dating! #shorts
2024-03-13DEBATE | Is Jesus Yahweh? || Praise I AM vs. Sean Griffin
2024-03-12DEBATE | Does Colossians Teach the Deity of Christ? - Anthony Rogers vs. Andrew Griffin
2024-03-12King James Only Debate | Is the KJB Uniquely Preserved? - Jonathan Shelley vs. TurretinFan
2024-03-11Bible Translation Debate | King James Only? || Will Kinney vs. TurretinFan
2024-03-10The Basis for Condemnation: John 3:18 - Irrefutable Evidence for Eternal Security
2024-03-10Why Large-Scale Evolution Does Not Fit Reality | Demolishing Common Descent in Under 60 Seconds!
2024-03-09End Times Theology Debate | Is The Millennium Future? - Pheelan McPhalen vs. Scott Clem
2024-03-09The BEST Explanation of Matthew 7:21-23 You'll Ever See!
2024-03-08DEBATE | Was the Apostolic Church Monoepiscopal? - Craig Truglia vs. TurretinFan
2024-03-08Debating Hebrews 3:12 in the Debate Dojo | Eternal Security vs. Conditional Security
2024-03-08Eternal Security is 100% Biblical! | Demolishing Conditional Security
2024-03-07John 15 Soteriology Debate Showdown | Abiding in Jesus - Can a Believer Lose His Salvation?
2024-03-07The UNSOLVABLE Challenge to the Fairy Tale of Evolution!
2024-03-07EPIC (AND LIVELY) OPEN MIC DEBATE | Debunking Bible Flock Box on Once Saved Always Saved!
2024-03-06Creation VS. Evolution | LIVE Q&A - With Dr. Grady McMurtry



Tags:
Creation vs evolution
theist
Bible
Jesus
Scripture
salvation
evangelism
Christian
Catholic
Young Earth Creation
YEC
Biblical truth
Evolution is fake news
New evidence of Creation
Creation science
Best evidence for creation
how to falsify evolution
How to prove God exists
Does God exist?
which God is true?
evolution exposed
atheism exposed
Darwin falsified
why evolution is wrong
is evolution true?
creation vs evolution
is God real?
which is the real God?